93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 955363)
1. [Negative smear in cervical carcinoma in situ (author's transl)].
Naujoks H; Leppien G; Rogosaroff-Fricke R
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1976 Jul; 36(7):570-5. PubMed ID: 955363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Preoperative evaluation by colposcopy and cytology in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (cin) (author's transl)].
Naujoks H; Köpf F; Leber I
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1979 May; 39(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 456858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Critical observations on the rate of "False Negative" findings in gynecologic cytology (author's transl)].
Bayrle W
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Oct; 37(10):864-8. PubMed ID: 924093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Do cytological criteria exist to determine the correct technique of a cytosmear of the uterine cervix? (author's transl)].
Soost HJ; Kattner W
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1976 Jan; 36(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 1248728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
Pairwuti S
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The combined use of cytology and colposcopy in enhancing diagnostic accuracy in preclinical lesions of the uterine cervix.
Lozowski MS; Mishriki Y; Talebian F; Solitare G
Acta Cytol; 1982; 26(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 6954809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Review of cervical smears in a gynaecologic department after a period of ten years under the consideration of colposcopic findings(author's transl)].
Michalzik K
Arch Gynakol; 1975; 218(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 1174025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A more accurate measure of the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear screening is obtained by determining the false-negative rate of the rescreening process.
Renshaw AA; DiNisco SA; Minter LJ; Cibas ES
Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 9349513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions and severe cervical combined lesions: predictive value of the papanicolaou smear.
van Aspert-van Erp AJ; Smedts FM; Vooijs GP
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 102(4):210-7. PubMed ID: 15368312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
Sherman ME; Kelly D
Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The significance of cervical cytologic dysplasia.
Jordan SW; Smith NL; Dike LS
Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 6942614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer.
Kristensen GB; Skyggebjerg KD; Hølund B; Holm K; Hansen MK
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 1994634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the adequacy of Pap smears.
Baker RM
Am Fam Physician; 1989 Jun; 39(6):109-14. PubMed ID: 2729036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and histological significance of atypical glandular cell on Pap smear.
Behtash N; Nazari Z; Fakhrejahani F; Khafaf A; Azar EG
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 47(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 17261100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. False-positive squamous cell carcinoma in cervical smears: cytologic-histologic correlation in 19 cases.
Levine PH; Elgert PA; Mittal K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jan; 28(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12508178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of the EA-rosette test in the early detection of cervical cancer.
Wagner D; Noltenius HW
Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 6576540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The costs of cancer screening (author's transl)].
Neumann G
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1975 Aug; 35(8):615-8. PubMed ID: 1175903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical carcinoma in situ undetected by Papanicolaou smear but identified by cervicography. A case report.
Ferris DG
J Fam Pract; 1994 Jan; 38(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 8289055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
