These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Radiographical evaluation of the gap at the implant-abutment interface. Papavassiliou H; Kourtis S; Katerelou J; Chronopoulos V J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Aug; 22(4):235-50. PubMed ID: 20690952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tube angulation effect on radiographic analysis of the implant-abutment interface. Begoña Ormaechea M; Millstein P; Hirayama H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 10074756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of Digital Versus Conventional Periapical Radiographs to Detect Misfit at the Implant-Abutment Interface. Cançado Oliveira BF; Valerio CS; Jansen WC; Zenóbio EG; Manzi FR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1023-9. PubMed ID: 27632256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A radiographic analysis of implant component misfit. Sharkey S; Kelly A; Houston F; O'Sullivan M; Quinn F; O'Connell B Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):807-15. PubMed ID: 21841991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Implant Connection Type and Depth on the Seating Accuracy of Hand-Tightened Abutments. Siadat H; Belbasi S; Alikhasi M; Nazari V; Beyabanaki E J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e661-e665. PubMed ID: 29239053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. COMMENTARY. Radiographical evaluation of the gap at the implant-abutment interface. Tarnow D J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Aug; 22(4):251. PubMed ID: 20690953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap. Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 1-year clinical report of a one-piece implant abutment. Carlson B; Jönsson G; Sandahl L; Nordin T; Hising P; Nelvig P; Branting C Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 11843453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster. Wise M J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis. Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants. Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible. King GN; Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Buser D; Cochran DL J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments. Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems. Lang LA; Sierraalta M; Hoffensperger M; Wang RF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):652-8. PubMed ID: 14579952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations. Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]