These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9554712)

  • 41. Civil commitment in Turkey: reflections on a bill drafted by psychiatrists.
    Arikan R; Appelbaum PS; Sercan M; Turkcan S; Satmis N; Polat A
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 16844221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Where involuntary commitment, civil liberties, and the right to mental health care collide: an overview of California's mental illness system.
    Karasch M
    Hastings Law J; 2003 Jan; 54(2):493-523. PubMed ID: 15287113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assaultive behavior in state psychiatric hospitals: differences between forensic and nonforensic patients.
    Linhorst DM; Scott LP
    J Interpers Violence; 2004 Aug; 19(8):857-74. PubMed ID: 15231026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. "We're only trying to help": the burden and standard of proof in short-term civil commitment.
    Henderson LN
    Stanford Law Rev; 1979 Feb; 31(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 10240958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Thirty-five years of working with civil commitment statutes.
    Bloom JD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 15704628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Gun laws and the involuntarily committed: a California road map.
    Zahedi S; Burchuk R; Stone DC; Kopelowicz A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 20019003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Involuntary commitment in Ontario: some barriers to the provision of proper care.
    McCormick WO
    Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Mar; 124(6):715-7. PubMed ID: 7471015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Patients' and next-of-kins' attitudes towards compulsory psychiatric care.
    Wallsten T; Ostman M; Sjöberg RL; Kjellin L
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2008; 62(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 18985515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Legal issues of emergency psychiatric patients: the application of EMTALA and state civil commitment laws.
    Mathis T; Leach TN; LeFevre CM
    J Health Hosp Law; 1996 Dec; 29(5):257-67. PubMed ID: 10164234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. From dangerousness to risk assessment of community violence: taking stock at the turn of the century.
    Steadman HJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 11055522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Current issues in the psychiatrist-patient relationship: outpatient civil commitment, psychiatric abandonment and the duty to continue treatment of potentially dangerous patients--balancing duties to patients and the public.
    Fentiman LC; Kaufman G; Merton V; Teitell EF; Zonana H
    Pace Law Rev; 2000; 20(2):231-62. PubMed ID: 12715804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The danger of dangerousness: why we must remove the dangerousness criterion from our mental health acts.
    Large MM; Ryan CJ; Nielssen OB; Hayes RA
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Dec; 34(12):877-81. PubMed ID: 19043114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessing dangerousness and responding appropriately: Hedlund expands the clinician's liability established by Tarasoff.
    Gross BH; Southard MJ; Lamb HR; Weinberger LE
    J Clin Psychiatry; 1987 Jan; 48(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 3804989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The involuntary commitment of adults. An examination of recent legal trends.
    Lonsdorf RG
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1983 Dec; 6(4):651-60. PubMed ID: 6664907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. ['I'll serve my time...' A pilot study on recidivism in forensic psychiatric patients forcibly hospitalized and treated for one year and on factors that affect recidivism].
    Peek WH; Nugter MA
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2009; 51(10):715-25. PubMed ID: 19821239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Stone-Roth model of civil commitment and the California dangerousness standard: operational comparison.
    Monahan J; Ruggiero M; Friedlander HD
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1982 Nov; 39(11):1267-71. PubMed ID: 7138227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Modernization of a mental health act II: outcome effects.
    Munetz MR; Kaufman KR; Rich CL
    J Clin Psychiatry; 1981 Sep; 42(9):333-7. PubMed ID: 7275939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Civil commitment of mentally ill patients: developments in Flanders].
    Nys H; Vandenberghe J
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2008; 50 Spec no.():55-60. PubMed ID: 19067301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Donaldson revisited: is dangerousness a constitutional requirement for civil commitment?
    Linburn GE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9785278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effect of framing actuarial risk probabilities on involuntary civil commitment decisions.
    Scurich N; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 20145984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.