These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9554728)

  • 1. Temporal stability of defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral lead system.
    Olsovsky MR; Pelini MA; Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Mar; 9(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 9554728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal decline in defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Olsovsky MR; Shorofsky SR; Kirk MM; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 Oct; 38(4):1150-5. PubMed ID: 11583896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of shock polarity on biphasic defibrillation thresholds using an active pectoral lead system.
    Olsovsky MR; Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Apr; 9(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 9581951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biphasic waveforms prevent the chronic rise of defibrillation thresholds with a transvenous lead system.
    Gold MR; Kavesh NG; Peters RW; Shorofsky SR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Jul; 30(1):233-6. PubMed ID: 9207647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of an active pectoral-pulse generator shell on defibrillation efficacy with a transvenous lead system.
    Gold MR; Foster AH; Shorofsky SR
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Sep; 78(5):540-3. PubMed ID: 8806339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of waveform and polarity on defibrillation thresholds in humans using a transvenous lead system.
    Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Aug; 78(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 8759811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds.
    Gold MR; Shorofsky SR; Bouhouch R; Joy RA; Kirby DS; Osman AF; Rashba EJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Apr; 13(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 12033348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of single- and dual-coil active pectoral defibrillation lead systems.
    Gold MR; Olsovsky MR; Pelini MA; Peters RW; Shorofsky SR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 May; 31(6):1391-4. PubMed ID: 9581739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lead system optimization for transvenous defibrillation.
    Gold MR; Foster AH; Shorofsky SR
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(9):1163-7. PubMed ID: 9359543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical predictors of atrial defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Brown T; Peters RW; Gold MR
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Jan; 2(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 15851265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early postoperative rise in defibrillation threshold in patients with nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems: attenuation with biphasic shock waveforms.
    Schwartzman D; Callans DJ; Gottlieb CD; Heo J; Marchlinski FE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Jun; 7(6):483-93. PubMed ID: 8743754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual-coil vs single-coil active pectoral implantable defibrillator lead systems: defibrillation energy requirements and probability of defibrillation success at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirements.
    Schulte B; Sperzel J; Carlsson J; Schwarz T; Ehrlich W; Pitschner HF; Neuzner J
    Europace; 2001 Jul; 3(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 11467457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of transvenous coil position for active can defibrillation thresholds.
    Gold MR; Olsovsky MR; DeGroot PJ; Cuello C; Shorofsky SR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 11(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 10695457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Atrial defibrillation with a transvenous lead: a randomized comparison of active can shocking pathways.
    Cooklin M; Olsovsky MR; Brockman RG; Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Aug; 34(2):358-62. PubMed ID: 10440146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of shock polarity on defibrillation thresholds with a hybrid patch-coil lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2003 Dec; 9(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 14618062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using an axillary or a pectoral thoracic electrode location.
    Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Raju R; Mathew P; Mehra R
    Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2655-60. PubMed ID: 8252676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biphasic waveform defibrillation using a three-electrode transvenous lead system in humans.
    Marks ML; Johnson G; Hofer BO; Bardy GH
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 8186880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chronic rise in monophasic defibrillation thresholds with a transvenous lead system.
    Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Khalighi K; Kavesh NG; Peters RW; Gold MR
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Feb; 79(4):502-5. PubMed ID: 9052360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized prospective study of single coil versus dual coil defibrillation in patients with ventricular arrhythmias undergoing implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.
    Rinaldi CA; Simon RD; Geelen P; Reek S; Baszko A; Kuehl M; Gill JS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Aug; 26(8):1684-90. PubMed ID: 12877701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.