These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9554763)

  • 1. Long-term outcome of intracoronary microstent implantation: lesion matched comparison with Palmaz-Schatz stent.
    Agarwal R; Bhargava B; Kaul U; Rao MB; Behl VK; Talwar KK; Manchanda SC
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1998 Apr; 43(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 9554763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term angiographic results of stenting in chronic total occlusions: influence of stent design and vessel size.
    Escaned J; Cortes J; Alcocer MA; Goicolea J; Alfonso F; Fernandez-Ortiz A; Hernandez R; Bañuelos C; Macaya C
    Am Heart J; 1999 Oct; 138(4 Pt 1):675-88. PubMed ID: 10502213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis in lesions treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents.
    Hoffmann R; Mintz GS; Mehran R; Pichard AD; Kent KM; Satler LF; Popma JJ; Wu H; Leon MB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Jan; 31(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 9426016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of immediate and follow-up results of the short and long NIR stent with the Palmaz-Schatz stent.
    Kobayashi Y; De Gregorio J; Kobayashi N; Reimers B; Albiero R; Vaghetti M; Finci L; Di Mario C; Colombo A
    Am J Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 84(5):499-504. PubMed ID: 10482144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Serial angiographic follow-up after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation: comparison with conventional balloon angioplasty.
    Kimura T; Nosaka H; Yokoi H; Iwabuchi M; Nobuyoshi M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Jun; 21(7):1557-63. PubMed ID: 8496519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and angiographic outcome after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation guided by intravascular ultrasound.
    Hall P; Nakamura S; Maiello L; Almagor Y; Gaglione A; Goldberg SL; Tobis JM; Martini G; Tucci G; Di Maggio M
    J Invasive Cardiol; 1995; 7 Suppl A():12A-22A. PubMed ID: 10155111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative studies of the rate of restenosis after implantation of Palmaz-Schatz and AVE-Micro stents].
    Sick P; Schumann E; Zindler G; Heisterhagen A; Junghans U; Lauer B; Zotz R; Hambrecht R; Kuhn A; Krankenberg H; Spranger C; Mohr F; Schuler G
    Z Kardiol; 1997 Dec; 86(12):1000-9. PubMed ID: 9499498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomised comparison of Micro Stent I with Palmaz-Schatz stent placement for the elective treatment of short coronary stenoses.
    Menafoglio A; Eeckhout E; Debbas N; Faivre R; Petiteau PY; Vogt P; Stauffer JC; Goy JJ
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1998 Apr; 43(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 9554765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimized expansion of the Wallstent compared with the Palmaz-Schatz stent: on-line observations with two- and three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound after angiographic guidance.
    von Birgelen C; Gil R; Ruygrok P; Prati F; Di Mario C; van der Giessen WJ; de Feyter PJ; Serruys PW
    Am Heart J; 1996 Jun; 131(6):1067-75. PubMed ID: 8644583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in restenosis propensity of devices for transluminal coronary intervention. A quantitative angiographic comparison of balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stent implantation and excimer laser angioplasty. CARPORT, MERCATOR, MARCATOR, PARK, and BENESTENT Trial Groups.
    Foley DP; Melkert R; Umans VA; de Jaegere PP; Strikwerda S; de Feyter PJ; Serruys PW
    Eur Heart J; 1995 Oct; 16(10):1331-46. PubMed ID: 8746901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Periprocedural quantitative coronary angiography after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation predicts the restenosis rate at six months: results of a meta-analysis of the BElgian NEtherlands Stent study (BENESTENT) I, BENESTENT II Pilot, BENESTENT II and MUSIC trials. Multicenter Ultrasound Stent In Coronaries.
    Serruys PW; Kay IP; Disco C; Deshpande NV; de Feyter PJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Oct; 34(4):1067-74. PubMed ID: 10520792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of results of intracoronary implantation of the Plamaz-Schatz stent with conventional balloon angioplasty in chronic total coronary arterial occlusion.
    Mori M; Kurogane H; Hayashi T; Yasaka Y; Ohta S; Kajiya T; Takarada A; Yoshida A; Matsuda Y; Nakagawa K; Murata T; Yoshida Y; Yokoyama M
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Nov; 78(9):985-9. PubMed ID: 8916475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Are directional coronary atherectomy and Palmaz-Schatz stent more efficacious than conventional balloon angioplasty for treating de novo coronary artery lesions?].
    Nanasato M; Adachi M; Hirayama H; Tsuji Y; Yamada T; Yoshida Y; Yamada K; Miwata S; Tsuboi N; Itoh T; Maeda S; Kuriyama K
    J Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 30(3):117-24. PubMed ID: 9309507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Single-center experience with the Palmaz-Schatz intracoronary stent: the immediate results and medium- and long-term follow-up].
    Galassi AR; Tamburino C; Grassi R; Monaco A; Russo G; Ierna SM; Calvi V; Giuffrida G
    Cardiologia; 1996 Nov; 41(11):1097-105. PubMed ID: 9064207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term angiographic and clinical outcome after implantation of a balloon-expandable stent in the native coronary circulation. Palmaz-Schatz Stent Study Group.
    Savage MP; Fischman DL; Schatz RA; Teirstein PS; Leon MB; Baim D; Ellis SG; Topol EJ; Hirshfeld JW; Cleman MW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Nov; 24(5):1207-12. PubMed ID: 7930240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The PARAGON stent study: a randomized trial of a new martensitic nitinol stent versus the Palmaz-Schatz stent for treatment of complex native coronary arterial lesions.
    Holmes DR; Lansky A; Kuntz R; Bell MR; Buchbinder M; Fortuna R; O'Shaughnessy CD; Popma J
    Am J Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 86(10):1073-9. PubMed ID: 11074202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No subacute thrombosis and femoral bleeding complications under full anticoagulation in 150 consecutive patients receiving non-heparin-coated intracoronary Palmaz-Schatz stents.
    Lee SW; Chen MZ; Chan HW; Lam L; Guo JX; Mao JM; Lam KK; Guo LJ; Li HY; Chan KK
    Am Heart J; 1996 Dec; 132(6):1135-46. PubMed ID: 8969564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term (4- to 6-year) outcome of Palmaz-Schatz stenting: paucity of late clinical stent-related problems.
    Laham RJ; Carrozza JP; Berger C; Cohen DJ; Kuntz RE; Baim DS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Oct; 28(4):820-6. PubMed ID: 8837554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acute and long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of coronary stenting using Palmaz-Schatz stent and ACS Multi-Link stent.
    Hsieh IC; Chang HJ; Huang HL; See LC; Chern MS; Hung KC; Lin FC; Wu D
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Aug; 62(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 15274153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up after placement of Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent: a single center experience.
    Kimura T; Tamura T; Yokoi H; Nobuyoshi M
    J Interv Cardiol; 1994 Apr; 7(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 10151040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.