These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9555204)

  • 41. Detection of the cemento-enamel junction with three different probes: an "in vitro" model.
    Barendregt DS; van der Velden U; Timmerman MF; Bulthuis HM; van der Weijden F
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Mar; 36(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 19196382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Assessment of Myeloperoxidase and Nitric Levels around Dental Implants and Natural Teeth as a Marker of Inflammation: A Comparative Study.
    Kulkarni GH; Jadhav P; Kulkarni K; Shinde SV; Patil YB; Kumar M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):934-938. PubMed ID: 27965504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reproducibility of an electronic probe in relative attachment level measurements.
    Yang MC; Marks RG; Magnusson I; Clouser B; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):541-8. PubMed ID: 1447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Microbiota of successful osseointegrated dental implants.
    Lee KH; Maiden MF; Tanner AC; Weber HP
    J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 10102550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. CrossLaps and beta-glucuronidase in peri-implant and gingival crevicular fluid.
    Schubert U; Kleber BM; Strietzel FP; Dörfling P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 11324213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of periodontal and peri-implant conditions in patients with implant-supported prosthesis.
    Abreu MH; Bianchini MA; Magini RS; Rösing CK
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2007; 20(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 18590257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of two automated periodontal probes and two probes with a conventional readout in periodontal maintenance patients.
    Barendregt DS; Van der Velden U; Timmerman MF; van der Weijden GA
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Apr; 33(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 16553636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reproducibility of attachment level measurements with two models of the Florida Probe.
    Marks RG; Low SB; Taylor M; Baggs R; Magnusson I; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 18(10):780-4. PubMed ID: 1753003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Demonstration of probes in human periodontal pockets.
    Garnick JJ; Spray JR; Vernino DM; Klawitter JJ
    J Periodontol; 1980 Oct; 51(10):563-70. PubMed ID: 7003089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Improvements in methods of periodontal probing: comparison of relative attachment level data selected by outlier reduction protocols from Florida disc probe measurements.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Johnson NW
    J Clin Periodontol; 2002 Aug; 29(8):679-87. PubMed ID: 12390563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Comparative probing with an electronic and a manual periodontal probe].
    Becherer CF; Rateitschak KH; Hefti AF
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1993; 103(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 8322056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Dynamics of initial subgingival colonization of 'pristine' peri-implant pockets.
    Quirynen M; Vogels R; Peeters W; van Steenberghe D; Naert I; Haffajee A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 16441782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Osseointegrated implants in subjects treated for generalized aggressive periodontitis: 10-year results of a prospective, long-term cohort study.
    Mengel R; Behle M; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    J Periodontol; 2007 Dec; 78(12):2229-37. PubMed ID: 18052693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Depth-force patterns of periodontal probing. Attachment-gain in relation to probing force.
    Mombelli A; Mühle T; Frigg R
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 May; 19(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 1517472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Reproducibility and validity of the assessment of clinical furcation parameters as related to different probes.
    Eickholz P; Kim TS
    J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 9579619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reliability of single and double probing attachment level measurements.
    Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; Case D; Thomas J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 22(10):764-71. PubMed ID: 8682923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Inpatient evaluation of periodontal, esthetic and inflammatory parameters around dental implants and natural teeth.
    Güncü GN; Büyüktepe G; Aşkin SB; Kilinç K; Tümer C; Tözüm TF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 23579901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Analysis of cathepsin-K levels in biologic fluids from healthy or diseased natural teeth and dental implants.
    Yamalik N; Günday S; Kilinc K; Karabulut E; Berker E; Tözüm TF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):991-7. PubMed ID: 22010081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Current interpretations of periodontal probing evaluations: diagnostic and therapeutic implications.
    Greenstein G
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Jun; 26(6):381-2, 384, 387-90 passim; quiz 398-9. PubMed ID: 16021957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The influence of gingival health status on periodontal probing measurements. A clinical study in humans.
    Molina GO; Souza SL; Grisi MF; Novaes AB; Taba M
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 6(2):56-62. PubMed ID: 15125016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.