211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9555215)
1. Marginal adaptation to enamel of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivo.
van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Dec; 1(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9555215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions.
Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
Dent Mater; 1998 Jul; 14(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 10379259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interfacial adaptation of in vivo aged polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) restorations in primary molars. A SEM evaluation.
Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Dec; 2(4):184-90. PubMed ID: 10388392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems.
Yap AU; Lim CC; Neo JC
Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):817-20. PubMed ID: 8628842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of gingivitis around aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and resin composite.
van Dijken JW; Sjöström S
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Dec; 2(4):180-3. PubMed ID: 10388391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of enamel conditioning on bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composites.
Attin T; Buchalla W; Hellwig E
J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jul; 76(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 8814631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal adaptation and performance of bioactive dental restorative materials in deciduous and young permanent teeth.
Gjorgievska E; Nicholson JW; Iljovska S; Slipper IJ
J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19089281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Durability of new restorative materials in Class III cavities.
van Dijken JW
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11317385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal adaptation of resin-bonded light-cured glass ionomers in dentin cavities.
Fritz UB; Finger WJ; Uno S
Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 9545879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of pretreatment with an oxalic acid solution on marginal adaptation to enamel in vivo.
van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jul; 80(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 9656181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal adaptation of a new compomer under different conditioning methods.
Luo Y; Tay FR; Lo EC; Wei SH
J Dent; 2000 Sep; 28(7):495-500. PubMed ID: 10960753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of finishing time on the marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified resin composite.
Lim CC; Neo J; Yap A
J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Jan; 26(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 10080324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations.
van Dijken JW
Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Longevity of new hybrid restorative materials in class III cavities.
van Dijken JW
Eur J Oral Sci; 1999 Jun; 107(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 10424386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of multi-step dentin bonding systems and resin-modified glass ionomer cement liner on marginal quality of dentin-bonded resin composite Class II restorations.
Haller B; Trojanski A
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Sep; 2(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 9927914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
