These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9555373)
41. A survey of midwives in Quebec: what are their similarities and differences? Hatem-Asmar M; Blais R; Lambert J; Maheux B Birth; 1996 Jun; 23(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 8826173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The rise, fall and rise of nurse-midwifery in America. Capitulo KL MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1998; 23(6):314-21. PubMed ID: 9819523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Two southern California midwives and their nurse practitioner assistant. Gaskin IM Birth Gaz; 1994; 10(2):2-3. PubMed ID: 8054871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Sound choices: Part 3: Decision making and negligence. Price A Mod Midwife; 1995 Aug; 5(8):10-3. PubMed ID: 7655939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Regulation of Certified Nurse-Midwife Scope of Practice: Change in the Professional Practice Index, 2000 to 2015. Beal MW; Batzli ME; Hoyt A J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(5):510-8. PubMed ID: 26382028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. How nurse-midwives define themselves in relation to nursing, medicine, and midwifery. Scoggin J J Nurse Midwifery; 1996; 41(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 8820756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The doctorate of nursing practice and entry into midwifery practice: Issues for consideration and debate. Fullerton JT; Schuiling KD; Sipe TA Nurse Educ Pract; 2019 Mar; 36():97-100. PubMed ID: 30897461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Clinical negligence and the need to keep professionally updated. Tingle J Br J Nurs; 2002 Nov 14-27; 11(20):1304-6. PubMed ID: 12476139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The National Practitioner Data Bank: information for and about midwifery. Jevitt C; Schuiling KD; Summers L J Midwifery Womens Health; 2005; 50(6):525-30. PubMed ID: 16260367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The risk of nurse-midwives assessing patients by phone. Case on point: Ali v. Community Health Care Plan, Inc., 801 A.2d. 775-CT (2002). Tammelleo AD Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Aug; 43(3):2. PubMed ID: 12224350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Midwifery: state enjoins practice. Case in point: Smith v. State Ex. Rel. Medical Lic. Bd. (459 N.E. 2d 401-IN). Regan WA Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Apr; 24(11):4. PubMed ID: 6562669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Forensic psychiatry and malpractice. Modlin HC Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 2372576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Midwives act. Important changes secured by the OIIQ. Desrosiers G Infirm Que; 1999; 6(6):4-7. PubMed ID: 10786498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Standard of care and liability in medical malpractice litigation in Japan. Hagihara A; Nishi M; Nobutomo K Health Policy; 2003 Aug; 65(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 12849911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Liability of pediatric nurses for professional negligence in Taiwan: a case study]. Huang HM; Sun FK Hu Li Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 61(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 24676953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Think ahead to minimise risks of midwifery care. Williams J Nurs Times; 1997 May 14-20; 93(20):58-60. PubMed ID: 9197760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Credentialing and privileging nurse-midwives. Cooper E J Nurs Care Qual; 1998 Apr; 12(4):30-5. PubMed ID: 9529795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The Belgian, French and Dutch midwife on trial: A critical case study. Eggermont M Midwifery; 2015 May; 31(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 25769187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Oral Histories of Nurse-Midwives in Georgia, 1970-1989: Blazing Trails, Building Fences, Raising Towers. Thrower EJB J Midwifery Womens Health; 2018 Nov; 63(6):693-699. PubMed ID: 29803201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]