These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

551 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9555550)

  • 1. Gleason scores from prostate biopsies obtained with 18-gauge biopsy needles poorly predict Gleason scores of radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Djavan B; Kadesky K; Klopukh B; Marberger M; Roehrborn CG
    Eur Urol; 1998; 33(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 9555550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
    Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
    Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of concordance of Gleason score between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
    Mansouri N; Msakni I; Gargouri F; Khiari R; Bouziani A; Laabidi B
    Tunis Med; 2018 Jul; 96(7):430-436. PubMed ID: 30430487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does prostate biopsy Gleason score accurately express the biologic features of prostate cancer?
    Stav K; Judith S; Merald H; Leibovici D; Lindner A; Zisman A
    Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):383-6. PubMed ID: 17826654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patterns of prostate cancer biopsy grading: trends and clinical implications.
    King CR
    Int J Cancer; 2000 Dec; 90(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 11180133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
    Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy tissue.
    Cecchi M; Minervini R; Sepich CA; Ippolito C; Pagni GL; Summonti D; Di Benedetto A; Fiorentini L
    Int Urol Nephrol; 1998; 30(5):575-80. PubMed ID: 9934800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
    Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score.
    Fine SW; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1335-8; discussion 1338-9. PubMed ID: 18289601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrepancy between Gleason scores of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Köksal IT; Ozcan F; Kadioglu TC; Esen T; Kiliçaslan I; Tunç M
    Eur Urol; 2000 Jun; 37(6):670-4. PubMed ID: 10828666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.
    Danneman D; Drevin L; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Robinson D; Bratt O; Loeb S; Stattin P; Egevad L
    BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 26918298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 years: is there evidence for systematic upgrading?
    Smith EB; Frierson HF; Mills SE; Boyd JC; Theodorescu D
    Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2282-7. PubMed ID: 12001128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation between the Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Shen BY; Tsui KH; Chang PL; Chuang CK; Hsieh ML; Huang ST; Wang TM; Lee SH; Huang HC; Huang SC
    Chang Gung Med J; 2003 Dec; 26(12):919-24. PubMed ID: 15008327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of prostate-specific antigen and tumor volume in predicting needle biopsy grading error.
    Kojima M; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ
    Urology; 1995 May; 45(5):807-12. PubMed ID: 7538243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of Gleason scores between needle-core biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens in patients with prostate cancer.
    Hsieh TF; Chang CH; Chen WC; Chou CL; Chen CC; Wu HC
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2005 Apr; 68(4):167-71. PubMed ID: 15850066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: accuracy and clinical implications.
    Cookson MS; Fleshner NE; Soloway SM; Fair WR
    J Urol; 1997 Feb; 157(2):559-62. PubMed ID: 8996356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interobserver agreement of Gleason score and modified Gleason score in needle biopsy and in surgical specimen of prostate cancer.
    Veloso SG; Lima MF; Salles PG; Berenstein CK; Scalon JD; Bambirra EA
    Int Braz J Urol; 2007; 33(5):639-46; discussion 647-51. PubMed ID: 17980061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
    King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biopsy Gleason score: how does it correlate with the final pathological diagnosis in prostate cancer?
    Fernandes ET; Sundaram CP; Long R; Soltani M; Ercole CJ
    Br J Urol; 1997 Apr; 79(4):615-7. PubMed ID: 9126095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing patient selection for prostate monotherapy.
    Lee AK; Schultz D; Renshaw AA; Richie JP; D'Amico AV
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Mar; 49(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 11172948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.