These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9556325)

  • 1. Reliability of photographic analysis in determining change in scar appearance.
    Crowe JM; Simpson K; Johnson W; Allen J
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1998; 19(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 9556325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.
    Kantor J
    JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Jan; 153(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27806156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability.
    Baryza MJ; Baryza GA
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1995; 16(5):535-8. PubMed ID: 8537427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A modified Vancouver Scar Scale linked with TBSA (mVSS-TBSA): Inter-rater reliability of an innovative burn scar assessment method.
    Gankande TU; Wood FM; Edgar DW; Duke JM; DeJong HM; Henderson AE; Wallace HJ
    Burns; 2013 Sep; 39(6):1142-9. PubMed ID: 23433706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) in objective scar evaluation.
    Lau JC; Li-Tsang CW; Zheng YP
    Burns; 2005 Jun; 31(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 15896506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of an objective scar pigmentation measurement by using a spectrocolorimeter.
    Li-Tsang CW; Lau JC; Liu SK
    Burns; 2003 Dec; 29(8):779-84. PubMed ID: 14636751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring reliability of scar rating scales using photographs of burns from children aged up to 15 years.
    Simons M; Ziviani J; Thorley M; McNee J; Tyack Z
    J Burn Care Res; 2013; 34(4):427-38. PubMed ID: 23271058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability testing of the Matching Assessment using Photographs of Scars App.
    Klotz T; Kurmis R
    Wound Repair Regen; 2020 Sep; 28(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 32347998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health professionals' and consumers' opinion: what is considered important when rating burn scars from photographs?
    Simons M; Tyack Z
    J Burn Care Res; 2011; 32(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 21233729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: interrater reliability and concurrent validity.
    Nedelec B; Correa JA; Rachelska G; Armour A; LaSalle L
    J Burn Care Res; 2008; 29(3):501-11. PubMed ID: 18388576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rating the resolving hypertrophic scar: comparison of the Vancouver Scar Scale and scar volume.
    Nedelec B; Shankowsky HA; Tredget EE
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2000; 21(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 10850901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective assessment of burn scar vascularity, erythema, pliability, thickness, and planimetry.
    Oliveira GV; Chinkes D; Mitchell C; Oliveras G; Hawkins HK; Herndon DN
    Dermatol Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 15720096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating accuracy and reliability of active stereophotogrammetry using MAVIS III Wound Camera for three-dimensional assessment of hypertrophic scars.
    Su S; Sinha S; Gabriel V
    Burns; 2017 Sep; 43(6):1263-1270. PubMed ID: 28363664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability testing of a new scar assessment tool, Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS).
    Masters M; McMahon M; Svens B
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005; 26(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 15879752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual assessment of linear scars: a new tool.
    Kerrigan CL; Homa K
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Nov; 124(5):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 20009837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic review of the quality of burn scar rating scales for clinical and research use.
    Tyack Z; Simons M; Spinks A; Wasiak J
    Burns; 2012 Feb; 38(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 22047828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rating the burn scar.
    Sullivan T; Smith J; Kermode J; McIver E; Courtemanche DJ
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1990; 11(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 2373734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliable scar scoring system to assess photographs of burn patients.
    Mecott GA; Finnerty CC; Herndon DN; Al-Mousawi AM; Branski LK; Hegde S; Kraft R; Williams FN; Maldonado SA; Rivero HG; Rodriguez-Escobar N; Jeschke MG
    J Surg Res; 2015 Dec; 199(2):688-97. PubMed ID: 26092214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effects of scar excision combined with negative-pressure on repair of hypertrophic scar in burn children].
    Cai JH; Deng HP; Shen ZA; Sun TJ; Li DJ; Li DW; He LX; Wang L; Jin X
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 33(7):410-414. PubMed ID: 28763906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®).
    Gankande TU; Duke JM; Danielsen PL; DeJong HM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
    Burns; 2014 Dec; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.