These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9556325)

  • 21. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®).
    Gankande TU; Duke JM; Danielsen PL; DeJong HM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
    Burns; 2014 Dec; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinimetric properties of a translated and culturally adapted Norwegian version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale for use in clinical practice and research.
    Hjellestad M; Strand LI; Eide GE; Brekke R; Nesheim A; Gjelsvik BEB
    Burns; 2021 Jun; 47(4):953-960. PubMed ID: 33139075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Self-care and Transfer scales, and intra-rater reliability of all scales of the Swedish Translation of the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT-S).
    Fristedt S; Andersson EE; Unsworth CA
    Scand J Occup Ther; 2013 May; 20(3):182-9. PubMed ID: 23480573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A guide to choosing a burn scar rating scale for clinical or research use.
    Tyack Z; Wasiak J; Spinks A; Kimble R; Simons M
    Burns; 2013 Nov; 39(7):1341-50. PubMed ID: 23768711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The evaluation of a clinical scar scale for porcine burn scars.
    Wang XQ; Kravchuk O; Liu PY; Kempf M; Boogaard CV; Lau P; Cuttle L; Mill J; Kimble RM
    Burns; 2009 Jun; 35(4):538-46. PubMed ID: 19201543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ultrasound is a reproducible and valid tool for measuring scar height in children with burn scars: A cross-sectional study of the psychometric properties and utility of the ultrasound and 3D camera.
    Simons M; Kee EG; Kimble R; Tyack Z
    Burns; 2017 Aug; 43(5):993-1001. PubMed ID: 28238405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interrater reliability of auscultation of breath sounds among physical therapists.
    Brooks D; Thomas J
    Phys Ther; 1995 Dec; 75(12):1082-8. PubMed ID: 7501711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development of a histomorphologic scale to quantify cutaneous scars after burns.
    Singer AJ; Thode HC; McClain SA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2000 Oct; 7(10):1083-8. PubMed ID: 11015238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determination of inter-rater reliability in pediatric burn scar assessment using a modified version of the Vancouver Scar Scale.
    Forbes-Duchart L; Marshall S; Strock A; Cooper JE
    J Burn Care Res; 2007; 28(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 17438503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: intrarater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity.
    Nedelec B; Correa JA; Rachelska G; Armour A; LaSalle L
    J Burn Care Res; 2008; 29(3):489-500. PubMed ID: 18388577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Clinical comparative study of pulsed dye laser and ultra-pulsed fractional carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of hypertrophic scars after burns].
    Li N; Yang L; Cheng J; Han JT; Hu DH
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 34(9):603-607. PubMed ID: 30293363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reliability of modified adheremeter and digital pressure algometer in measuring normal abdominal tissue and C-section scars.
    Kelly-Martin R; Doughty L; Garkavi M; Wasserman JB
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2018 Oct; 22(4):972-979. PubMed ID: 30368344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A new quantitative scale for clinical scar assessment.
    Beausang E; Floyd H; Dunn KW; Orton CI; Ferguson MW
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Nov; 102(6):1954-61. PubMed ID: 9810991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interrater and intrarater reliability of FDI criteria applied to photographs of posterior tooth-colored restorations.
    Kim D; Ahn SY; Kim J; Park SH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):18-25.e4. PubMed ID: 28024817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using digital photography to document rectus femoris flexibility: A reliability study of the modified Thomas test.
    Peeler J; Leiter J
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2013 May; 29(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 23088704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Clinical effects of sequential laser treatments on early stage hypertrophic burn scars].
    Xie WG; Lei F; Wang J; Xu J; Ruan JJ; Li Z
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 34(9):615-623. PubMed ID: 30293365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Risk factors for hypertrophic burn scar pain, pruritus, and paresthesia development.
    Xiao Y; Sun Y; Zhu B; Wang K; Liang P; Liu W; Fu J; Zheng S; Xiao S; Xia Z
    Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Mar; 26(2):172-181. PubMed ID: 29719102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved burn scar assessment with use of a new scar-rating scale.
    Yeong EK; Mann R; Engrav LH; Goldberg M; Cain V; Costa B; Moore M; Nakamura D; Lee J
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1997; 18(4):353-5; discussion 352. PubMed ID: 9261704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Endothelial dysfunction may play a key role in keloid and hypertrophic scar pathogenesis - Keloids and hypertrophic scars may be vascular disorders.
    Ogawa R; Akaishi S
    Med Hypotheses; 2016 Nov; 96():51-60. PubMed ID: 27959277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interrater and Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and Subsystems With Community-Dwelling Older Adults.
    Wang-Hsu E; Smith SS
    J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2018; 41(3):173-179. PubMed ID: 28079632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.