322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9558544)
1. Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and Fuji II glass ionomer cement.
Mallow PK; Durward CS; Klaipo M
Int J Paediatr Dent; 1998 Mar; 8(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9558544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survival rates of two atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) types in occlusal carious permanent teeth after two years.
Ibiyemi O; Bankole OO; Oke GA
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2011 Jun; 40(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 22195380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.
Dorri M; Martinez-Zapata MJ; Walsh T; Marinho VC; Sheiham Deceased A; Zaror C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD008072. PubMed ID: 29284075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years.
Frencken JE; Makoni F; Sithole WD
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 26(6):372-81. PubMed ID: 9870536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT.
Moura MS; Sousa GP; Brito MHSF; Silva MCC; Lima MDM; Moura LFAD; Lima CCB
Braz Oral Res; 2020; 33():e125. PubMed ID: 31994598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner.
Yassen G
J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19619427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How effective is ART in the management of dental caries?
Frencken JE; Holmgren CJ
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1999 Dec; 27(6):423-30. PubMed ID: 10600076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atraumatic restorative treatment with resin-modified glass ionomer material: short-term results of a pilot study.
Dülgergil CT; Soyman M; Civelek A
Med Princ Pract; 2005; 14(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 15961941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
Hübel S; Mejàre I
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
Banomyong D; Messer H
J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of three restorative materials applied in a minimal intervention caries treatment approach.
Zanata RL; Navarro MF; Barbosa SH; Lauris JR; Franco EB
J Public Health Dent; 2003; 63(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 14682645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up.
Deepa G; Shobha T
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 20642467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries.
Smales RJ; Yip HK
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 12073723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival of Fuji IX ART fillings in permanent teeth of primary school children in Tanzania.
Kikwilu EN; Mandari GJ; Honkala E
East Afr Med J; 2001 Aug; 78(8):411-3. PubMed ID: 11921563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results.
Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM; Yip HK; Smales RJ
Int Dent J; 2004 Feb; 54(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15005472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of the ART technique using high density and resin-modified glass lonomer cements.
de Souza EM; Cefaly DF; Terada RS; Rodrigues CC; de Lima Navarro MF
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2003; 1(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 15641498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
Olegário IC; Hesse D; Mendes FM; Bonifácio CC; Raggio DP
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1761-1770. PubMed ID: 30171345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
