BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9558583)

  • 1. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Reddy SA; Hicks ML
    J Endod; 1998 Mar; 24(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 9558583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques.
    Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Er K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 18230395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of apically extruded debris in conventional and rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Bidar M; Rastegar AF; Ghaziani P; Namazikhah MS
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Sep; 32(9):665-71. PubMed ID: 15553960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
    Er K; Sümer Z; Akpinar KE
    Int Endod J; 2005 Dec; 38(12):871-6. PubMed ID: 16343113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of debris extruded apically in straight canals: conventional filing versus profile .04 Taper series 29.
    Beeson TJ; Hartwell GR; Thornton JD; Gunsolley JC
    J Endod; 1998 Jan; 24(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 9487860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro evaluation of apical extrusion of bacteria following use of new rotary instrumentation system.
    Mohammadi Z
    N Y State Dent J; 2009 Apr; 75(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 19548490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Apically extruded debris with three contemporary Ni-Ti instrumentation systems: an ex vivo comparative study.
    Logani A; Shah N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 18797091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of amounts of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems.
    Hinrichs RE; Walker WA; Schindler WG
    J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9641140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An ex vivo quantification of the apically extruded bacteria following use of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Mohammadi Z
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(4):120-2. PubMed ID: 18277742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extrusion of debris after use of rotary nickel-titanium files with different pitch: a pilot study.
    Elmsallati EA; Wadachi R; Suda H
    Aust Endod J; 2009 Aug; 35(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 19703077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals.
    Siqueira JF; Araújo MC; Garcia PF; Fraga RC; Dantas CJ
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 9587319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jul; 39(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 16776756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    J Endod; 2012 Jun; 38(6):850-2. PubMed ID: 22595125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
    Ferraz CC; Gomes NV; Gomes BP; Zaia AA; Teixeira FB; Souza-Filho FJ
    Int Endod J; 2001 Jul; 34(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 11482718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
    Gergi R; Sabbagh C
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of various instrumentation techniques.
    Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Sümer Z; Er K; Bek B
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19133095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.