107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9558897)
1. "Cage" technology revolutionizes approach to spinal fusion surgery.
Lestini WF
N C Med J; 1998; 59(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 9558897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive spinal surgery: four common procedures described.
Khoury GH
J S C Med Assoc; 2000 Nov; 96(11):464-8. PubMed ID: 11138454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive arthroscopic spinal surgery.
Kambin P; McCullen G; Parke W; Regan JJ; Schaffer JL; Yuan H
Instr Course Lect; 1997; 46():143-61. PubMed ID: 9143957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Lumbar I/F Cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion with the variable screw placement system: 10-year results of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial.
Brantigan JW; Neidre A; Toohey JS
Spine J; 2004; 4(6):681-8. PubMed ID: 15541703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Fusion or replacement: reevaluation of the bone grafting and fusion of the cervical vertebrae].
Yuan W
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 85(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 15808067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.
Scholz M; Reyes PM; Schleicher P; Sawa AG; Baek S; Kandziora F; Marciano FF; Crawford NR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the B-twin expandable spinal spacer.
Gepstein R; Werner D; Shabat S; Folman Y
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2005 Dec; 48(6):330-3. PubMed ID: 16432781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Controversies about instrumented surgery and pain relief in degenerative lumbar spine pain. Results of scientific evidence].
Robaina-Padrón FJ
Neurocirugia (Astur); 2007 Oct; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 18008014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spine-tingling prospects. Artificial disc implants are among the new technologies expected to revolutionize the outcomes of back surgery.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2003 Nov; 33(45):30-2. PubMed ID: 14666550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel lumbosacral axial fixation techniques.
Ledet EH; Carl AL; Cragg A
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2006 May; 3(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 16681454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anterior cervical discectomy with or without fusion with ray titanium cage: a prospective randomized clinical study.
Hauerberg J; Kosteljanetz M; Bøge-Rasmussen T; Dons K; Gideon P; Springborg JB; Wagner A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(5):458-64. PubMed ID: 18317187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Theoretical basis for the optimal positioning of an intervertebral support after diskectomy].
Khvisiuk NI; Makovoz EM; Tugaev AS; Chikhladze ED
Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1981 May; (5):1-5. PubMed ID: 7267046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is one cage enough in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of unilateral single cage interbody fusion to bilateral cages.
Fogel GR; Toohey JS; Neidre A; Brantigan JW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 17285054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An open, minimally invasive approach to the lumbar spine.
Dewald CJ; Millikan KW; Hammerberg KW; Doolas A; Dewald RL
Am Surg; 1999 Jan; 65(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 9915535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Lee SH; Choi WG; Lim SR; Kang HY; Shin SW
Spine J; 2004; 4(6):644-9. PubMed ID: 15541696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive fusion and fixation techniques.
Powers CJ; Isaacs RE
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2006 Oct; 17(4):477-89. PubMed ID: 17010898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery.
Huang RC; Girardi FP; Lim MR; Cammisa FP
Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 15950686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical effect of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments.
Maiman DJ; Kumaresan S; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA
Biomed Mater Eng; 1999; 9(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 10436851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine.
Bono CM; Vaccaro AR
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 May; 20(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 17473649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Artificial disc replacement promises the end of spinal fusion technology].
Tian W
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 85(1):9. PubMed ID: 15808065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
