These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9559082)

  • 21. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials.
    Almuammar MF; Schulman A; Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12049082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of fluorosis on shear bond strength of glass ionomer-based restorative materials to dentin.
    Awliya WY; Akpata ES
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 10050116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Marginal adaptation of compomers in Class I and V cavities in primary molars.
    el-Kalla IH
    Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 10477997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bond strengths of a porcelain material to different abutment substrates.
    Ferrari M; Mannocci F; Vichi A; Goracci G
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 11203834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Compomers--a new bracket bonding generation in orthodontics?
    Eberhard H; Hirschfelder U; Sindel J
    J Orofac Orthop; 1997 Feb; 58(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 9300839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bond strengths of resin-modified glass ionomers and polyacid-modified resin composites to dentin.
    Abdalla AI; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 1997 Dec; 10(6):291-4. PubMed ID: 9590919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bond strength of brackets cemented with light-cured glass-ionomer cements to contaminated enamel.
    Itoh T; Fukushima T; Inoue Y; Matsuo N; Matsumoto M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 11763927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel.
    Duarte S; Botta AC; Meire M; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18762032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
    Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bond strength between resin composite and etched and non-etched glass ionomer.
    Zanata RL; Navarro MF; Ishikiriama A; da Silva e Souza Júnior MH; Delazari RC
    Braz Dent J; 1997; 8(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 9590929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mechanical properties of compomer restorative materials.
    el-Kalla IH; García-Godoy F
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 10337291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of the cutting speed on bond strength and integrity of microtensile specimens.
    Sadek FT; Cury AH; Monticelli F; Ferrari M; Cardoso PE
    Dent Mater; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1144-9. PubMed ID: 16002134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Shear strength of sealants placed with non-rinse conditioning compared to a conventional acid etch-rinse technique.
    Fuks AB; Eidelman E; Lewinstein I
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(3):239-42, 233. PubMed ID: 12613304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Shear peel bond strength of compomers veneered to amalgam.
    Al-Jazairy YH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 11319538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Role of hybridization on marginal leakage and bond strength.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN; Vichi A; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):329-36. PubMed ID: 11764128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of bonding variables on the shear bond strength and interfacial morphology of a one-bottle adhesive.
    Medina V; Shinkai K; Shirono M; Tanaka N; Katoh Y
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):277-86. PubMed ID: 11357571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of compomers in primary and permanent teeth.
    el-Kalla IH; García-Godoy F
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 1998 Jun; 8(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 9728095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Enamel and dentin bond strengths of single application bonding systems.
    Miyazaki S; Iwasaki K; Onose H; Moore BK
    Am J Dent; 2001 Dec; 14(6):361-6. PubMed ID: 11949795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.