These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9559480)

  • 21. Keratometry evaluations with the Pentacam high resolution in comparison with the automated keratometry and conventional corneal topography.
    Módis L; Szalai E; Kolozsvári B; Németh G; Vajas A; Berta A
    Cornea; 2012 Jan; 31(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22081146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Repeatability of the hand-held Nidek auto-keratometer in children.
    Noonan CP; Mackenzie J; Chandna A
    J AAPOS; 1998 Jun; 2(3):186-7. PubMed ID: 10532758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the EyeSys model II computerized videokeratoscope. Part I: Clinical assessment.
    Dave T; Ruston D; Fowler C
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Sep; 75(9):647-55. PubMed ID: 9778697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of Corneal Keratometric and Astigmatism Measurements Using Verion System and Other Instruments in Cataract Patient.
    Fu Y; Yu X; Savini G; Huang J; Lian H; Song B; Wang Q; Zhao Y
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Oct; 43(10):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 29890084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of keratometric measurements obtained by the Verion Image Guided System with optical biometry and auto-keratorefractometer.
    Asena L; Güngör SG; Akman A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 37(2):391-399. PubMed ID: 27271763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intrastromal corneal ring segments: effect of relationship between alignment and topographic keratometric meridians.
    Tu KL; Batterbury M; Kaye SB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1432-9. PubMed ID: 22814050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A hand-held keratometer.
    Lam AK
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 May; 15(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 7659423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of keratometric values of healthy and diseased eyes measured by Javal keratometer, EyeSys, and PAR.
    Varssano D; Rapuano CJ; Luchs JI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1997 Apr; 23(3):419-22. PubMed ID: 9159687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Scheimpflug keratometry versus conventional automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery.
    Symes RJ; Say MJ; Ursell PG
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1107-14. PubMed ID: 20610087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Precision of 5 different keratometry devices.
    Laursen JVN; Jeppesen P; Olsen T
    Int Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 36(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 25820577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliable keratometry with a new hand held surgical keratometer: calibration of the keratoscopic astigmatic ruler.
    Morlet N; Maloof A; Wingate N; Lindsay P
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jan; 82(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 9536877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the auto-refraction function of the Nidek OPD-Scan III.
    McGinnigle S; Naroo SA; Eperjesi F
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Mar; 97(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 24024877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery: comparison of Scheimpflug and conventional values.
    Symes RJ; Ursell PG
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Feb; 37(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 21241912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Agreement between a partial coherence interferometer and 2 manual keratometers.
    Bullimore MA; Buehren T; Bissmann W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1550-60. PubMed ID: 23876813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of corneal curvature using verion optical imaging system: a comparative study.
    Lauschke JL; Lawless M; Sutton G; Roberts TV; Hodge C
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 44(5):369-76. PubMed ID: 27381574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Differences in corneal astigmatism between partial coherence interferometry biometry and automated keratometry and relation to topographic pattern.
    Park JH; Kang SY; Kim HM; Song JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1694-8. PubMed ID: 21855766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative results of corneal curvature measurements with three different keratometers after radial keratotomy.
    Zhao L; Zhang L; Wang YL; Wang W; Yan Y
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Dec; 124(24):4260-3. PubMed ID: 22340396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of corneal astigmatism and axis location in cataract patients measured by total corneal power, automated keratometry, and simulated keratometry.
    Srivannaboon S; Soeharnila ; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Dec; 38(12):2088-93. PubMed ID: 22985831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of 4 specular microscopes in healthy eyes and eyes with cornea guttata or corneal grafts.
    Luft N; Hirnschall N; Schuschitz S; Draschl P; Findl O
    Cornea; 2015 Apr; 34(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 25719252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.