These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9559497)

  • 1. Comparison between high-pass resolution perimetry and differential light sensitivity perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Birt CM; Shin DH; McCarty B; Kim C; Lee DT; Chung HS
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Apr; 7(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9559497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-pass resolution perimetry and light-sense perimetry in open-angle glaucoma.
    Meyer JH; Funk J
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jul; 4(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 7492934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
    Chauhan BC; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between GDx VCC parameter and achromatic perimetry in glaucoma patients.
    Iester M; Perdicchi A; De Feo F; Fiesoletti E; Amodeo S; Sanna G; Leonardi A; Calabria G
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 16865003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients.
    King AJ; Taguri A; Wadood AC; Azuara-Blanco A
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 240(6):481-7. PubMed ID: 12107516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of conventional and pattern discrimination perimetry in a prospective study of glaucoma patients.
    Ansari I; Chauhan BC; McCormick TA; LeBlanc RP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Dec; 41(13):4150-7. PubMed ID: 11095608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2.
    Huang CQ; Carolan J; Redline D; Taravati P; Woodward KR; Johnson CA; Wall M; Keltner JL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The visual field indices in primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Flanagan JG; Wild JM; Trope GE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 34(7):2266-74. PubMed ID: 8505208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
    Artes PH; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discriminating ability of Humphrey matrix perimetry in early glaucoma patients.
    Hong S; Chung W; Hong YJ; Seong GJ
    Ophthalmologica; 2007; 221(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 17440283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interocular asymmetry of visual field defects in primary open angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma.
    Wang JC; Gazzard G; Foster PJ; Devereux JG; Oen FT; Chew PT; Khaw PT; Seah SK
    Eye (Lond); 2004 Apr; 18(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 15069431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation between high-pass resolution perimetry and standard threshold perimetry in subjects with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Iester M; Capris P; Altieri M; Zingirian M; Traverso CE
    Int Ophthalmol; 1999; 23(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 11196128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
    Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Teesalu P; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):2077-81. PubMed ID: 9818609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.