BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9560104)

  • 1. Long-term model of induced canine phonation.
    Paniello RC; Dahm JD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 Apr; 118(4):512-22. PubMed ID: 9560104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Function of the interarytenoid muscle in a canine laryngeal model.
    Nasri S; Beizai P; Sercarz JA; Kreiman J; Graves MC; Berke GS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1994 Dec; 103(12):975-82. PubMed ID: 7993010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laryngeal modeling: theoretical, in vitro, in vivo.
    Berke GS; Moore DM; Hantke DR; Hanson DG; Gerratt BR; Burstein F
    Laryngoscope; 1987 Jul; 97(7 Pt 1):871-81. PubMed ID: 3600140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a Closed-Loop Stimulator for Laryngeal Reanimation: Part 2. Device Testing in the Canine Model of Laryngeal Paralysis.
    Heaton JT; Kobler JB; Otten DM; Hillman RE; Zeitels SM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2019 Mar; 128(3_suppl):53S-70S. PubMed ID: 30843434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A pressure-regulated model of normal and pathologic phonation.
    Nasri S; Namazie A; Kreiman J; Sercarz JA; Gerratt BR; Berke GS
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Dec; 111(6):807-15. PubMed ID: 7991263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of superior laryngeal nerve on vocal fold function: an in vivo canine model.
    Slavit DH; McCaffrey TV; Yanagi E
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1991 Dec; 105(6):857-63. PubMed ID: 1787976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of superior laryngeal nerve stimulation on phonation in an in vivo canine model.
    Berke GS; Moore DM; Gerratt BR; Hanson DG; Natividad M
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1989; 10(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 2742054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A quantitative study of the medial surface dynamics of an in vivo canine vocal fold during phonation.
    Doellinger M; Berry DA; Berke GS
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Sep; 115(9):1646-54. PubMed ID: 16148711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ex vivo perfused larynx model of phonation: preliminary study.
    Berke GS; Neubauer J; Berry DA; Ye M; Chhetri DK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2007 Nov; 116(11):866-70. PubMed ID: 18074674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of air flow and medial adductory compression on vocal efficiency and glottal vibration.
    Berke GS; Hanson DG; Gerratt BR; Trapp TK; Macagba C; Natividad M
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1990 Mar; 102(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 2108407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Function of the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle in phonation: in vivo laryngeal model.
    Choi HS; Berke GS; Ye M; Kreiman J
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1993 Dec; 109(6):1043-51. PubMed ID: 8265188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differentiated laryngeal phonation.
    Pesák J
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1990; 42(6):296-301. PubMed ID: 2081581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characteristics of an in vivo canine model of phonation with a constant air pressure source.
    Nasri S; Namazie A; Ye M; Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Berke GS
    Laryngoscope; 1996 Jun; 106(6):745-51. PubMed ID: 8656961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of recurrent laryngeal nerve stimulation on phonation in an in vivo canine model.
    Berke GS; Moore DM; Gerratt BR; Hanson DG; Bell TS; Natividad M
    Laryngoscope; 1989 Sep; 99(9):977-82. PubMed ID: 2770387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exit jet particle velocity in the in vivo canine laryngeal model with variable nerve stimulation.
    Bielamowicz S; Berke GS; Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Voice; 1999 Jun; 13(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 10442746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of concentric needle versus hooked-wire electrodes in the canine larynx.
    Jaffe DM; Solomon NP; Robinson RA; Hoffman HT; Luschei ES
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 May; 118(5):655-62. PubMed ID: 9591865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transtracheal stimulation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve.
    Berke GS; Moore DM; Gerratt B; Aly A; Tantisira J
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1988; 9(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 3358482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of laryngeal sound generation with FFT analysis of glottic impedance in patients with recurrent nerve paralysis].
    Ptok M; Sesterhenn G; Arold R
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1993; 45(4):182-97. PubMed ID: 8406268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of tension, stiffness, and airflow on laryngeal resistance in the in vivo canine model.
    Bielamowicz S; Berke GS; Kreiman J; Sercarz JA; Green DC; Gerratt BR
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1993 Oct; 102(10):761-8. PubMed ID: 8215095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The pitch rise paradigm: a new task for real-time endoscopy of non-stationary phonation.
    Rasp O; Lohscheller J; Doellinger M; Eysholdt U; Hoppe U
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2006; 58(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 16636565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.