149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9560406)
1. Genetic basis of response to 50 generations of selection on body weight in inbred mice.
Keightley PD
Genetics; 1998 Apr; 148(4):1931-9. PubMed ID: 9560406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accumulation of mutations affecting body weight in inbred mouse lines.
Caballero A; Keightley PD; Hill WG
Genet Res; 1995 Apr; 65(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 7781996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic diversity and population structure in lines of chickens divergently selected for high and low 8-week body weight.
Márquez GC; Siegel PB; Lewis RM
Poult Sci; 2010 Dec; 89(12):2580-8. PubMed ID: 21076095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response to selection from new mutation and effective size of partially inbred populations. II. Experiments with Drosophila melanogaster.
Merchante M; Caballero A; López-Fanjul C
Genet Res; 1995 Dec; 66(3):227-40. PubMed ID: 8600019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term selection for protein amount over 70 generations in mice.
Bünger L; Renne U; Dietl G; Kuhla S
Genet Res; 1998 Oct; 72(2):93-109. PubMed ID: 9883096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The genetic basis of response in mouse lines divergently selected for body weight or fat content. I. The relative contributions of autosomal and sex-linked genes.
Hastings IM; Veerkamp RF
Genet Res; 1993 Dec; 62(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 8157168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation of changes in genetic parameters in selected lines of mice using REML with an animal model. 1. Lean mass.
Beniwal BK; Hastings IM; Thompson R; Hill WG
Heredity (Edinb); 1992 Oct; 69 ( Pt 4)():352-60. PubMed ID: 1428952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of changes in genetic parameters in selected lines of mice using REML with an animal model. 2. Body weight, body composition and litter size.
Beniwal BK; Hastings IM; Thompson R; Hill WG
Heredity (Edinb); 1992 Oct; 69 ( Pt 4)():361-71. PubMed ID: 1428953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The genetic basis of response in mouse lines divergently selected for body weight or fat content. II. The contribution of genes with a large effect.
Veerkamp RF; Haley CS; Knott SA; Hastings IM
Genet Res; 1993 Dec; 62(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 8157169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Yearling trait comparisons among inbred lines and selected noninbred and randomly bred control groups of Rambouillet, Targhee and Columbia ewes.
Ercanbrack SK; Knight AD
J Anim Sci; 1983 Feb; 56(2):316-29. PubMed ID: 6841289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term responses, changes in genetic variances and inbreeding depression from 122 generations of selection on increased litter size in mice.
Holt M; Meuwissen T; Vangen O
J Anim Breed Genet; 2005 Jun; 122(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 16130472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximizing genetic gain over multiple generations with quantitative trait locus selection and control of inbreeding.
Villanueva B; Dekkers JC; Woolliams JA; Settar P
J Anim Sci; 2004 May; 82(5):1305-14. PubMed ID: 15144069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative genetic variation in body size of mice from new mutations.
Keightley PD; Hill WG
Genetics; 1992 Jul; 131(3):693-700. PubMed ID: 1628812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic evaluation of the ratio of calf weaning weight to cow weight.
MacNeil MD
J Anim Sci; 2005 Apr; 83(4):794-802. PubMed ID: 15753333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mass selection for 70-day body weight in rabbits.
Lukefahr SD; Odi HB; Atakora JK
J Anim Sci; 1996 Jul; 74(7):1481-9. PubMed ID: 8818792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Thirty-four generations of divergent selection for 8-week body weight in chickens.
Flisar T; Malovrh S; Tercic D; Holcman A; Kovac M
Poult Sci; 2014 Jan; 93(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 24570418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response to selection and genetic parameters of body and carcass weights in Japanese quail selected for 4-week body weight.
Khaldari M; Pakdel A; Mehrabani Yeganeh H; Nejati Javaremi A; Berg P
Poult Sci; 2010 Sep; 89(9):1834-41. PubMed ID: 20709967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproductive performance in a diallel cross among lines of mice selected for litter size and body weight.
Hörstgen-Schwark G; Eisen EJ; Saxton AM; Bandy TR
J Anim Sci; 1984 Apr; 58(4):846-62. PubMed ID: 6539325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic analysis of a strain of mice plateaued for litter size.
Eklund J; Bradford GE
Genetics; 1977 Mar; 85(3):529-42. PubMed ID: 558934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic variation in spontaneous ovulation rate and LH receptor induction in mice.
Spearow JL; Bradford GE
J Reprod Fertil; 1983 Nov; 69(2):529-37. PubMed ID: 6313917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
