These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9560575)

  • 21. Using flowable composites in direct posterior restorations.
    Prager MC
    Dent Today; 1997 Jul; 16(7):62, 64, 66-9. PubMed ID: 9560702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Full-mouth reconstruction of bulim ravaged teeth using direct composites: a case presentation.
    Belvedere PC
    Dent Today; 2009 Jan; 28(1):126, 128, 130-1. PubMed ID: 19323338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of microfil composite resins for Class V restorations: a technique.
    Seitchik SW
    Compend Contin Educ Dent (Lawrenceville); 1984 May; 5(5):419-23, 427. PubMed ID: 6594211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Matrix systems for posterior composite restorations.
    Schulein TM; Covey DA; Johnson WW
    Compendium; 1987 Oct; 8(9):668, 670, 672 passim. PubMed ID: 3481288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Options for aesthetic conservative Class I restorations.
    Radz GM; Vocaturo AJ
    Dent Today; 1996 Aug; 15(8):54, 56-7. PubMed ID: 9567792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A technique for placing multiple composite restorations.
    Talbot TR
    Restorative Dent; 1985 Jan; 1(3):83-4, 86. PubMed ID: 3857697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Restoring Class III caries using a custom matrix.
    Hamilton JC
    Alpha Omegan; 1997; 90(3):10-6. PubMed ID: 9555185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A permanently bondable matrix band for composite restorations.
    Din FM
    Compendium; 1992 Oct; 13(10):836, 838, 840 passim. PubMed ID: 1423398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. New metal matrix strips for composite restorations.
    Fagelman J
    Dent Surv; 1980 Dec; 56(12):26-8. PubMed ID: 6939634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Overcoming obstacles to placing posterior direct resin restorations.
    Bertolotti RL
    Dent Today; 2000 Jul; 19(7):66-71. PubMed ID: 12524821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Simple matrix bands for composite resins].
    Ishizuka O; Igarashi S
    Shikai Tenbo; 1982 Dec; 60(6):1147-52. PubMed ID: 6961557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations in naturally occurring abraded or eroded areas.
    Hembree JH
    J Ala Dent Assoc; 1980; 64(2):20-3. PubMed ID: 6932423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Preparation forms and filling techniques for posterior composite restorations].
    Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):461-3. PubMed ID: 11921992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Achieving anatomic proximal contacts with direct composite resin restorations.
    Rada RE
    Dent Today; 2000 Mar; 19(3):46-50. PubMed ID: 12522857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
    Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A matrix solution for severly broken-down teeth.
    Knight JS
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(2):150-2. PubMed ID: 8690264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative study of composite resin placement: centripetal buildup versus incremental technique.
    Szep S; Frank H; Kenzel B; Gerhardt T; Heidemann D
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 13(3):243-50; quiz 252. PubMed ID: 11360771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Excellence in class II direct composite restorations.
    Shuman I
    Dent Today; 2007 Apr; 26(4):102, 104-5. PubMed ID: 17486784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Canabarro S; Lopes GC; Ritter AV
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 14531591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.