These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9560575)
21. Using flowable composites in direct posterior restorations. Prager MC Dent Today; 1997 Jul; 16(7):62, 64, 66-9. PubMed ID: 9560702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Full-mouth reconstruction of bulim ravaged teeth using direct composites: a case presentation. Belvedere PC Dent Today; 2009 Jan; 28(1):126, 128, 130-1. PubMed ID: 19323338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Use of microfil composite resins for Class V restorations: a technique. Seitchik SW Compend Contin Educ Dent (Lawrenceville); 1984 May; 5(5):419-23, 427. PubMed ID: 6594211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Matrix systems for posterior composite restorations. Schulein TM; Covey DA; Johnson WW Compendium; 1987 Oct; 8(9):668, 670, 672 passim. PubMed ID: 3481288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Options for aesthetic conservative Class I restorations. Radz GM; Vocaturo AJ Dent Today; 1996 Aug; 15(8):54, 56-7. PubMed ID: 9567792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Restoring Class III caries using a custom matrix. Hamilton JC Alpha Omegan; 1997; 90(3):10-6. PubMed ID: 9555185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A permanently bondable matrix band for composite restorations. Din FM Compendium; 1992 Oct; 13(10):836, 838, 840 passim. PubMed ID: 1423398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. New metal matrix strips for composite restorations. Fagelman J Dent Surv; 1980 Dec; 56(12):26-8. PubMed ID: 6939634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations in naturally occurring abraded or eroded areas. Hembree JH J Ala Dent Assoc; 1980; 64(2):20-3. PubMed ID: 6932423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Preparation forms and filling techniques for posterior composite restorations]. Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):461-3. PubMed ID: 11921992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Achieving anatomic proximal contacts with direct composite resin restorations. Rada RE Dent Today; 2000 Mar; 19(3):46-50. PubMed ID: 12522857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations. Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A matrix solution for severly broken-down teeth. Knight JS Gen Dent; 1996; 44(2):150-2. PubMed ID: 8690264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative study of composite resin placement: centripetal buildup versus incremental technique. Szep S; Frank H; Kenzel B; Gerhardt T; Heidemann D Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 13(3):243-50; quiz 252. PubMed ID: 11360771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Excellence in class II direct composite restorations. Shuman I Dent Today; 2007 Apr; 26(4):102, 104-5. PubMed ID: 17486784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: three-year results. Baratieri LN; Canabarro S; Lopes GC; Ritter AV Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 14531591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations. Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]