These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. The effect of operational speed on the fracture of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Kitchens GG; Liewehr FR; Moon PC J Endod; 2007 Jan; 33(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 17185131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals. Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Canal wall planning by engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments, compared with stainless-steel hand instrumentation. Tucker DM; Wenckus CS; Bentkover SK J Endod; 1997 Mar; 23(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9594758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Finishing the apical one third. Endodontic considerations. Ruddle CJ Dent Today; 2002 May; 21(5):66-70, 72-3. PubMed ID: 12026723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison between a hand stainless-steel K file and a rotary NiTi 0.04 taper. Namazikhah MS; Mokhlis HR; Alasmakh K J Calif Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 28(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 11324127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effectiveness of the ProFile.04 Taper Series 29 files in removal of gutta-percha root fillings during curved root canal retreatment. Valois CR; Navarro M; Ramos AA; de Castro AJ; Gahyva SM Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 11450685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of fracture rate, deformation rate, and efficiency between rotary endodontic instruments driven at 150 rpm and 350 rpm. Daugherty DW; Gound TG; Comer TL J Endod; 2001 Feb; 27(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 11491646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Factors influencing the life span of modern root canal instruments--a literature review. Jonker C; van der Vyver PJ SADJ; 2013 Feb; 68(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 23951756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The wonderful world of rotary root canal preparation. Spångberg L Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Nov; 92(5):479. PubMed ID: 11709677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of amounts of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems. Hinrichs RE; Walker WA; Schindler WG J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9641140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effectiveness of three instrumentation techniques on the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from a root canal: an in vitro study. Colak M; Evcil S; Bayindir YZ; Yigit N J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Feb; 6(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 15719081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient. Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Factors contributing to the separation of endodontic files. Madarati AA; Watts DC; Qualtrough AJ Br Dent J; 2008 Mar; 204(5):241-5. PubMed ID: 18327187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimal obturation and shaping. Wahl P Dent Today; 1996 Jun; 15(6):78-81. PubMed ID: 9567818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]