These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9561872)

  • 1. Breakage and acceptability of a polyurethane condom: a randomized, controlled study.
    Frezieres RG; Walsh TL; Nelson AL; Clark VA; Coulson AH
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 9561872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the efficacy of a polyurethane condom: results from a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Frezieres RG; Walsh TL; Nelson AL; Clark VA; Coulson AH
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 10224546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the efficacy of a nonlatex condom: results from a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Walsh TL; Frezieres RG; Peacock K; Nelson AL; Clark VA; Bernstein L
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2003; 35(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 12729137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Condom breakage and slippage among men in the United States.
    Grady WR; Tanfer K
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1994; 26(3):107-12. PubMed ID: 8070546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of the male latex condom: combined results for three popular condom brands used as controls in randomized clinical trials.
    Walsh TL; Frezieres RG; Peacock K; Nelson AL; Clark VA; Bernstein L; Wraxall BG
    Contraception; 2004 Nov; 70(5):407-13. PubMed ID: 15504381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Condom slippage and breakage rates.
    Trussell J; Warner DL; Hatcher RA
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 1601122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preliminary comparison of the polyurethane female condom with the latex male condom in Kenya.
    Ruminjo JK; Steiner M; Joanis C; Mwathe EG; Thagana N
    East Afr Med J; 1996 Feb; 73(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 8756048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Latex condom breakage and slippage in a controlled clinical trial.
    Rosenberg MJ; Waugh MS
    Contraception; 1997 Jul; 56(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 9306027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceptability evaluation of a natural rubber latex, a polyurethane, and a new non-latex condom.
    Frezieres RG; Walsh TL
    Contraception; 2000 Jun; 61(6):369-77. PubMed ID: 10958880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized crossover trial of the impact of additional spermicide on condom failure rates.
    Gabbay MB; Thomas J; Gibbs A; Hold P
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Oct; 35(10):862-8. PubMed ID: 18685543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can condom users likely to experience condom failure be identified?
    Steiner M; Piedrahita C; Glover L; Joanis C
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1993; 25(5):220-3, 226. PubMed ID: 8262171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The male polyurethane condom: a review of current knowledge.
    Rosenberg MJ; Waugh MS; Solomon HM; Lyszkowski AD
    Contraception; 1996 Mar; 53(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 8689877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of the Reality polyurethane female condom and a synthetic latex prototype: a randomized crossover trial among South African women.
    Beksinska M; Smit J; Mabude Z; Vijayakumar G; Joanis C
    Contraception; 2006 Apr; 73(4):386-93. PubMed ID: 16531173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative crossover study of the PATH Woman's Condom and the FC Female Condom.
    Schwartz JL; Barnhart K; Creinin MD; Poindexter A; Wheeless A; Kilbourne-Brook M; Mauck CK; Weiner DH; Callahan MM
    Contraception; 2008 Dec; 78(6):465-73. PubMed ID: 19014792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breakage and slippage of condoms among users in north Gondar Province, Ethiopia.
    Mekonen E; Mekonen A
    East Afr Med J; 1999 Sep; 76(9):481-3. PubMed ID: 10685314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The acceptability of the female and male condom: a randomized crossover trial.
    Kulczycki A; Kim DJ; Duerr A; Jamieson DJ; Macaluso M
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2004; 36(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 15306269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical breakage, slippage and acceptability of a new commercial polyurethane condom: a randomized, controlled study.
    Potter WD; de Villemeur M
    Contraception; 2003 Jul; 68(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 12878286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of the male latex condom and of the female polyurethane condom as barriers to semen during intercourse: a randomized clinical trial.
    Macaluso M; Blackwell R; Jamieson DJ; Kulczycki A; Chen MP; Akers R; Kim DJ; Duerr A
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Jul; 166(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 17420182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review calls Avanti safe; expert questions validity.
    AIDS Alert; 1996 Apr; 11(4):45-6. PubMed ID: 11363405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pilot study of short-term acceptability and breakage and slippage rates for the loose-fitting polyurethane male condom eZ.on bi-directional: a randomized cross-over trial.
    Bounds W; Molloy S; Guillebaud J
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2002 Jun; 7(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 12201325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.