These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9562045)

  • 1. Costs and outcomes of AIDS care: comparing a health maintenance organization with fee-for-service systems in the Boston Health Study.
    Wilson IB; Sullivan LM; Weissman JS
    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol; 1998 Apr; 17(5):424-32. PubMed ID: 9562045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coordinated system of care cuts costs, maintains quality for persons with AIDS.
    Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep; 1998 Aug; 3(8):123-5. PubMed ID: 10182723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of stroke patients in Medicare fee for service and managed care.
    Retchin SM; Brown RS; Yeh SC; Chu D; Moreno L
    JAMA; 1997 Jul; 278(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 9214526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disability outcomes of older Medicare HMO enrollees and fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries.
    Porell FW; Miltiades HB
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2001 May; 49(5):615-31. PubMed ID: 11380756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in 4-year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and fee-for-service systems. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.
    Ware JE; Bayliss MS; Rogers WH; Kosinski M; Tarlov AR
    JAMA; 1996 Oct; 276(13):1039-47. PubMed ID: 8847764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Satisfaction with medical care among elderly people in fee-for-service care and an HMO.
    Kasper JD; Riley G
    J Aging Health; 1992 May; 4(2):282-302. PubMed ID: 10117875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Primary care quality in the Medicare Program: comparing the performance of Medicare health maintenance organizations and traditional fee-for-service medicare.
    Safran DG; Wilson IB; Rogers WH; Montgomery JE; Chang H
    Arch Intern Med; 2002 Apr; 162(7):757-65. PubMed ID: 11926848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Timeliness and quality of care for elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction under health maintenance organization vs fee-for-service insurance.
    Soumerai SB; McLaughlin TJ; Gurwitz JH; Pearson S; Christiansen CL; Borbas C; Morris N; McLaughlin B; Gao X; Ross-Degnan D
    Arch Intern Med; 1999 Sep; 159(17):2013-20. PubMed ID: 10510986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. HMO performance: the debate goes on.
    Sullivan K
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2002; 21(5):303-4; author reply 304-5. PubMed ID: 12224902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rehospitalization and survival for stroke patients in managed care and traditional Medicare plans.
    Smith MA; Frytak JR; Liou JI; Finch MD
    Med Care; 2005 Sep; 43(9):902-10. PubMed ID: 16116355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of Medicare fee-for-service and a group-model HMO in the inpatient management and long-term survival of elderly individuals with syncope.
    Getchell WS; Larsen GC; Morris CD; McAnulty JH
    Am J Manag Care; 2000 Oct; 6(10):1089-98. PubMed ID: 11184665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Home health quality outcomes. Fee-for-service versus health maintenance organization enrollees.
    Adams CE; Kramer S; Wilson M
    J Nurs Adm; 1995 Nov; 25(11):39-45. PubMed ID: 7472628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of length of stay and costs for health maintenance organization and fee-for-service patients.
    Stern RS; Juhn PI; Gertler PJ; Epstein AM
    Arch Intern Med; 1989 May; 149(5):1185-8. PubMed ID: 2497713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Case mix of home health patients under capitated and fee-for-service payment.
    Shaughnessy PW; Schlenker RE; Hittle DF
    Health Serv Res; 1995 Apr; 30(1):79-113. PubMed ID: 7721587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of functional outcomes after hip fracture in group/staff HMOs and fee-for-service systems.
    Coleman EA; Kramer AM; Kowalsky JC; Eckhoff D; Lin M; Hester EJ; Morgenstern N; Steiner JF
    Eff Clin Pract; 2000; 3(5):229-39. PubMed ID: 11185328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does managed care lead to better or worse quality of care?
    Miller RH; Luft HS
    Health Aff (Millwood); 1997; 16(5):7-25. PubMed ID: 9314673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changing nature of physician satisfaction with health maintenance organization and fee-for-service practices.
    Schulz R; Scheckler WE; Moberg DP; Johnson PR
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Oct; 45(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 9343053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How do HMOs achieve savings? The effectiveness of one organization's strategies.
    Flood AB; Fremont AM; Jin K; Bott DM; Ding J; Parker RC
    Health Serv Res; 1998 Apr; 33(1):79-99. PubMed ID: 9566179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient-level cost of home health care under capitated and fee-for-service payment.
    Schlenker RE; Shaughnessy PW; Hittle DF
    Inquiry; 1995; 32(3):252-70. PubMed ID: 7591040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is gatekeeping better than traditional care? A survey of physicians' attitudes.
    Halm EA; Causino N; Blumenthal D
    JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(20):1677-81. PubMed ID: 9388087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.