These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9563108)

  • 1. Multicycle mechanical performance of titanium and stainless steel transpedicular spine implants.
    Pienkowski D; Stephens GC; Doers TM; Hamilton DM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Apr; 23(7):782-8. PubMed ID: 9563108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is galvanic corrosion between titanium alloy and stainless steel spinal implants a clinical concern?
    Serhan H; Slivka M; Albert T; Kwak SD
    Spine J; 2004; 4(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 15246296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Notch sensitivity of titanium alloy, commercially pure titanium, and stainless steel spinal implants.
    Dick JC; Bourgeault CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Aug; 26(15):1668-72. PubMed ID: 11474353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of transfixation and length of instrumentation on titanium and stainless steel transpedicular spine implants.
    Korovessis P; Baikousis A; Deligianni D; Mysirlis Y; Soucacos P
    J Spinal Disord; 2001 Apr; 14(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 11285422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical performance of the new posterior spinal implant: effect of materials, connecting plate, and pedicle screw design.
    Chen PQ; Lin SJ; Wu SS; So H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 May; 28(9):881-6; discussion 887. PubMed ID: 12942002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between 4.0-mm stainless steel and 4.75-mm titanium alloy single-rod spinal instrumentation for anterior thoracoscopic scoliosis surgery.
    Yoon SH; Ugrinow VL; Upasani VV; Pawelek JB; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2173-8. PubMed ID: 18794758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Titanium versus stainless steel for anterior spinal fusions: an analysis of rod stress as a predictor of rod breakage during physiologic loading in a bovine model.
    Wedemeyer M; Parent S; Mahar A; Odell T; Swimmer T; Newton P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17202891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant Material, Type of Fixation at the Shaft, and Position of Plate Modify Biomechanics of Distal Femur Plate Osteosynthesis.
    Kandemir U; Augat P; Konowalczyk S; Wipf F; von Oldenburg G; Schmidt U
    J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Aug; 31(8):e241-e246. PubMed ID: 28394844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of two materials for dynamic hip screw during fall and gait loading: titanium alloy and stainless steel.
    Taheri NS; Blicblau AS; Singh M
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Nov; 16(6):805-13. PubMed ID: 21877191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Titanium-alloy enhances bone-pedicle screw fixation: mechanical and histomorphometrical results of titanium-alloy versus stainless steel.
    Christensen FB; Dalstra M; Sejling F; Overgaard S; Bünger C
    Eur Spine J; 2000 Apr; 9(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 10823424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro biomechanical comparison of multistrand cables with conventional cervical stabilization.
    Weis JC; Cunningham BW; Kanayama M; Parker L; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Sep; 21(18):2108-14. PubMed ID: 8893435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical assessment of titanium and stainless steel posterior spinal constructs: effects of absolute/relative loading and frequency on fatigue life and determination of failure modes.
    Stambough JL; Genaidy AM; Huston RL; Serhan H; El-khatib F; Sabri EH
    J Spinal Disord; 1997 Dec; 10(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 9438811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bacterial adherence to tantalum versus commonly used orthopedic metallic implant materials.
    Schildhauer TA; Robie B; Muhr G; Köller M
    J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Jul; 20(7):476-84. PubMed ID: 16891939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of rod contouring on spinal construct fatigue strength.
    Lindsey C; Deviren V; Xu Z; Yeh RF; Puttlitz CM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):1680-7. PubMed ID: 16816763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of stainless steel and titanium low-contact dynamic compression plate application on the vascularity and mechanical properties of cortical bone after fracture.
    Jain R; Podworny N; Hearn T; Anderson GI; Schemitsch EH
    J Orthop Trauma; 1997 Oct; 11(7):490-5. PubMed ID: 9334950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of stainless steel and titanium alloy orthodontic miniscrew implants: a mechanical and histologic analysis.
    Brown RN; Sexton BE; Gabriel Chu TM; Katona TR; Stewart KT; Kyung HM; Liu SS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 24703288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new lumbar posterior fixation system, the memory metal spinal system: an in-vitro mechanical evaluation.
    Kok D; Firkins PJ; Wapstra FH; Veldhuizen AG
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Sep; 14():269. PubMed ID: 24047109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of femoral component material properties on cementless fixation in total hip arthroplasty. A comparison study between carbon composite, titanium alloy, and stainless steel.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE; McCarthy DS
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Feb; 8(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 8436992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of magnetic and radiographic imaging artifact after using three types of metal rods: stainless steel, titanium, and vitallium.
    Knott PT; Mardjetko SM; Kim RH; Cotter TM; Dunn MM; Patel ST; Spencer MJ; Wilson AS; Tager DS
    Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):789-94. PubMed ID: 20619749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical Performance of Charcot-Specific Implants.
    Wukich DK; Liu GT; Raspovic K; Vicenzi F
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2021; 60(3):440-447. PubMed ID: 33612405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.