329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9563110)
1. A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Scoliometer and Adam's forward bend test.
Côté P; Kreitz BG; Cassidy JD; Dzus AK; Martel J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Apr; 23(7):796-802; discussion 803. PubMed ID: 9563110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the scoliometer and Adam's forward bend test (Spine 1999;23;796-802).
Côté P; Cassidy JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Nov; 24(22):2411-2. PubMed ID: 10586469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An assessment of the reliability of the Scoliometer.
Murrell GA; Coonrad RW; Moorman CT; Fitch RD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 May; 18(6):709-12. PubMed ID: 8516699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of the Adams forward bend test and the scoliometer in a scoliosis school screening setting.
Grossman TW; Mazur JM; Cummings RJ
J Pediatr Orthop; 1995; 15(4):535-8. PubMed ID: 7560050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of scoliotic cobb angle with the use of the scoliometer.
Korovessis PG; Stamatakis MV
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jul; 21(14):1661-6. PubMed ID: 8839469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Practical Study of Diagnostic Accuracy: Scoliosis Screenings of Middle School Students by a Trained Nurse With a Smartphone Versus a Spine Surgeon With a Scoliometer.
Chen C; Yu R; Xu W; Li Z; Li Y; Hu R; Zhu X
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Mar; 45(5):E266-E271. PubMed ID: 31568349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scoliometer measurements of patients with idiopathic scoliosis.
Coelho DM; Bonagamba GH; Oliveira AS
Braz J Phys Ther; 2013; 17(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 23778766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Systematic Review of All Smart Phone Applications Specifically Aimed for Use as a Scoliosis Screening Tool.
Naziri Q; Detolla J; Hayes W; Burekhovich S; Merola A; Akamnanu C; Paulino CB
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2018; 28(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 29772989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools.
Qiao J; Xu L; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Liu Z; Qian B; Qiu Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Oct; 15():343. PubMed ID: 25305758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is Shoulder Imbalance a Useful Parameter in the Screening of Idiopathic Scoliosis? A Preliminary Study.
Torres PAR; Castilho AM; Lopes KRC; Pellizzoni L; Righesso O; Falavigna A
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo); 2023 Aug; 58(4):e625-e631. PubMed ID: 37663184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cut-off point of the Scoliometer in school scoliosis screening.
Huang SC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Sep; 22(17):1985-9. PubMed ID: 9306527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inter and intra-rater reliability of the scoliometer.
Bonagamba GH; Coelho DM; Oliveira AS
Rev Bras Fisioter; 2010; 14(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 21049239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ten-year follow-up evaluation of a school screening program for scoliosis. Is the forward-bending test an accurate diagnostic criterion for the screening of scoliosis?
Karachalios T; Sofianos J; Roidis N; Sapkas G; Korres D; Nikolopoulos K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Nov; 24(22):2318-24. PubMed ID: 10586455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychometric evaluation of spinal assessment methods to screen for scoliosis in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.
Persson-Bunke M; Czuba T; Hägglund G; Rodby-Bousquet E
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Nov; 16():351. PubMed ID: 26578150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. School screening for scoliosis in India. The evaluation of a scoliometer.
Mittal RL; Aggerwal R; Sarwal AK
Int Orthop; 1987; 11(4):335-8. PubMed ID: 3440651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis].
; ; ; ; ;
Arch Argent Pediatr; 2016 Dec; 114(6):585-594. PubMed ID: 27869435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity and reliability testing of the Scoliometer.
Amendt LE; Ause-Ellias KL; Eybers JL; Wadsworth CT; Nielsen DH; Weinstein SL
Phys Ther; 1990 Feb; 70(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 2296610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of two-parameter scoliometer values for predicting scoliotic Cobb angle.
Ma HH; Tai CL; Chen LH; Niu CC; Chen WJ; Lai PL
Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Dec; 16(1):136. PubMed ID: 29202876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: review and current concepts.
Reamy BV; Slakey JB
Am Fam Physician; 2001 Jul; 64(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 11456428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]