These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9563221)

  • 21. Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: multicenter study in healthy volunteers.
    Tutuian R; Vela MF; Balaji NS; Wise JL; Murray JA; Peters JH; Shay SS; Castell DO
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2003 May; 1(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 15017488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers.
    Ghosh SK; Pandolfino JE; Zhang Q; Jarosz A; Shah N; Kahrilas PJ
    Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2006 May; 290(5):G988-97. PubMed ID: 16410365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. NORMATIVE VALUES FOR A NEW WATER-PERFUSED HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY SYSTEM.
    Silva RMBD; Herbella FAM; Gualberto D
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2018 Nov; 55Suppl 1(Suppl 1):30-34. PubMed ID: 30088532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reproducibility of esophageal high-resolution manometry.
    Bogte A; Bredenoord AJ; Oors J; Siersema PD; Smout AJ
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2011 Jul; 23(7):e271-6. PubMed ID: 21496179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biomechanical and sensory parameters of the human esophagus at four levels.
    Patel RS; Rao SS
    Am J Physiol; 1998 Aug; 275(2):G187-91. PubMed ID: 9688644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of manometric assembly diameter on intraluminal esophageal pressure recording.
    Lydon SB; Dodds WJ; Hogan WJ; Arndorfer RC
    Am J Dig Dis; 1975 Oct; 20(10):968-70. PubMed ID: 1190207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Normal values for manometry performed with swallows of viscous test material.
    Blonski W; Vela M; Hila A; Castell DO
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2008; 43(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 18224562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Esophageal contraction pressures are not affected by normal menstrual cycles.
    Nelson JL; Richter JE; Johns DN; Castell DO; Centola GM
    Gastroenterology; 1984 Oct; 87(4):867-71. PubMed ID: 6468874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relationship between pressure wave amplitude and esophageal bolus clearance assessed by combined manometry and multichannel intraluminal impedance measurement.
    Nguyen NQ; Tippett M; Smout AJ; Holloway RH
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Nov; 101(11):2476-84. PubMed ID: 17029613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Significant pressure differences between solid-state and water-perfused systems in lower esophageal sphincter measurement.
    Gehwolf P; Hinder RA; DeVault KR; Edlinger M; Wykypiel HF; Klingler PJ
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Dec; 29(12):3565-9. PubMed ID: 25701063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An analysis of distal esophageal impedance in individuals with and without esophageal motility abnormalities.
    Blonski W; Hila A; Vela MF; Castell DO
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Aug; 42(7):776-81. PubMed ID: 18360293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of position on esophageal structure and function determined with solid-state high-resolution manometry.
    Zhang XJ; Xiang XL; Tu L; Xie XP; Hou XH
    J Dig Dis; 2015 Jun; 16(6):350-6. PubMed ID: 25940059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of sildenafil on esophageal motility of normal subjects.
    Bortolotti M; Mari C; Giovannini M; Pinna S; Miglioli M; Pandolfo N
    Dig Dis Sci; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2301-6. PubMed ID: 11713926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Deterioration of esophageal motility with age: a manometric study of 79 healthy subjects.
    Grande L; Lacima G; Ros E; Pera M; Ascaso C; Visa J; Pera C
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Jul; 94(7):1795-801. PubMed ID: 10406237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Distension-evoked motility analysis in human esophagus.
    Liao D; Villadsen GE; Gregersen H
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2013 May; 25(5):407-12, e296-7. PubMed ID: 23360205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lower esophageal sphincter relaxation: studies on the neurogenic inhibitory mechanism.
    Tuch A; Cohen S
    J Clin Invest; 1973 Jan; 52(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 4682381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Manometry and impedance characteristics of achalasia. Facts and myths.
    Agrawal A; Hila A; Tutuian R; Castell DO
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Mar; 42(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 18223498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Proximal esophageal contractions in laryngectomized patients.
    Dantas RO; Aguiar-Ricz LN; Gielow I; Filho FV; Mamede RC
    Dysphagia; 2005; 20(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 16172817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Characteristics of the propagating pressure wave in the esophagus.
    Clouse RE; Staiano A; Bickston SJ; Cohn SM
    Dig Dis Sci; 1996 Dec; 41(12):2369-76. PubMed ID: 9011445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IN MEN AND WOMEN EVALUATED BY HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY.
    Costa TV; Dantas RO
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2017; 54(2):145-147. PubMed ID: 28273277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.