These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9563533)

  • 1. Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display.
    Hanna GB; Shimi SM; Cuschieri A
    Ann Surg; 1998 Apr; 227(4):481-4. PubMed ID: 9563533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of the angle between the optical axis of the endoscope and the instruments' plane on monitor image and surgical performance.
    Patil PV; Hanna GB; Cuschieri A
    Surg Endosc; 2004 Jan; 18(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 14625750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of instrument size on endoscopic task performance in pediatric intracorporeal knot tying: smaller instruments are better in infants.
    Lee AC; Haddad MJ; Hanna GB
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Nov; 21(11):2086-90. PubMed ID: 17516118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing.
    Emam TA; Hanna G; Cuschieri A
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Feb; 16(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 11967676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of intracorporeal-extracorporeal instrument length ratio on endoscopic task performance and surgeon movements.
    Emam TA; Hanna GB; Kimber C; Dunkley P; Cuschieri A
    Arch Surg; 2000 Jan; 135(1):62-5; discussion 66. PubMed ID: 10636349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of automatic image realignment on visuomotor coordination in simulated laparoscopic surgery.
    Zhang L; Cao CG
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Nov; 43(6):993-1001. PubMed ID: 22373561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal port locations for endoscopic intracorporeal knotting.
    Hanna GB; Shimi S; Cuschieri A
    Surg Endosc; 1997 Apr; 11(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 9094288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of direction of view, target-to-endoscope distance and manipulation angle on endoscopic knot tying.
    Hanna GB; Shimi S; Cuschieri A
    Br J Surg; 1997 Oct; 84(10):1460-4. PubMed ID: 9361614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative evaluation of three advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies: a stereo endoscope, an image projection display, and a TFT display.
    Wentink M; Jakimowicz JJ; Vos LM; Meijer DW; Wieringa PA
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Aug; 16(8):1237-41. PubMed ID: 11984691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of orthodox versus off-optical axis endoscopic manipulations.
    Emam TA; Hanna G; Cuschieri A
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Mar; 16(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 11928016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reaction times and the decision-making process in endoscopic surgery.
    Zheng B; Janmohamed Z; MacKenzie CL
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Sep; 17(9):1475-80. PubMed ID: 12811661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the benefits of "gaze-down" display location in complex tasks.
    Omar AM; Wade NJ; Brown SI; Cuschieri A
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Jan; 19(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 15531972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simulated laparoscopy using a head-mounted display vs traditional video monitor: an assessment of performance and muscle fatigue.
    Maithel SK; Villegas L; Stylopoulos N; Dawson S; Jones DB
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Mar; 19(3):406-11. PubMed ID: 15624063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of face-mounted binocular video display for laparoscopy: outcomes of psychometric skills testing and surgeon satisfaction.
    Minnich DJ; Schell SR
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2003 Oct; 13(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 14617395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Virtual hand laboratory meets endoscopic surgery.
    MacKenzie CL; Graham ED; Cao CG; Lomax AJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 62():212-8. PubMed ID: 10538359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rocker handle for endoscopic needle drivers. Technical and ergonomic evaluation by infrared motion analysis system.
    Emam TA; Frank TG; Hanna GB; Stockham G; Cuschieri A
    Surg Endosc; 1999 Jul; 13(7):658-61. PubMed ID: 10384070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individualized image display improves performance in laparoscopic surgery.
    Thakkar RK; Steigman SA; Aidlen JT; Luks FI
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Dec; 22(10):1010-3. PubMed ID: 22731802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of heads-up display imaging on endoscopic task performance.
    Ryndin I; Lukasewycz S; Hoffman N; Nakib NA; Best S; Monga M
    J Endourol; 2005 Oct; 19(8):964-7. PubMed ID: 16253059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of head-mounted display in transanal endoscopic microsurgery.
    van Koesveld JJ; Tetteroo GW; de Graaf EJ
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Jun; 17(6):943-6. PubMed ID: 12632129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing laparoscopic task efficiency: the role of camera and monitor positions.
    Haveran LA; Novitsky YW; Czerniach DR; Kaban GK; Taylor M; Gallagher-Dorval K; Schmidt R; Kelly JJ; Litwin DE
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Jun; 21(6):980-4. PubMed ID: 17436042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.