These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9564450)

  • 1. Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses.
    Friederici AD; Steinhauer K; Mecklinger A; Meyer M
    Biol Psychol; 1998 Mar; 47(3):193-221. PubMed ID: 9564450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intersentential syntactic context effects on comprehension: the role of working memory.
    Vos SH; Friederici AD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Mar; 16(1):111-22. PubMed ID: 12589896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Plausibility and verb subeategorization in temporarily ambiguous sentences: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Traxler MJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2005 Jan; 34(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 15968918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural correlates of semantic and syntactic processes in the comprehension of case marked pronouns: evidence from German and Dutch.
    Lamers MJ; Jansma BM; Hammer A; Münte TF
    BMC Neurosci; 2006 Mar; 7():23. PubMed ID: 16526952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preschool children's interpretation of object-initial sentences: neural correlates of their behavioral performance.
    Schipke CS; Knoll LJ; Friederici AD; Oberecker R
    Dev Sci; 2012 Nov; 15(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 23106730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An fMRI study of canonical and noncanonical word order in German.
    Bahlmann J; Rodriguez-Fornells A; Rotte M; Münte TF
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Oct; 28(10):940-9. PubMed ID: 17274018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Processing of temporary syntactic ambiguity in Italian "who"-questions: a study with event-related potentials.
    Penolazzi B; De Vincenzi M; Angrilli A; Job R
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Mar; 377(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 15740843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPs: a difficult case for activation theories.
    Gunter TC; Wagner S; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):643-57. PubMed ID: 12965038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence comprehension for low and high span readers.
    Fiebach CJ; Vos SH; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 16(9):1562-75. PubMed ID: 15601519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the cost of syntactic ambiguity in human language comprehension: an individual differences approach.
    Bornkessel ID; Fiebach CJ; Friederici AD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 21(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 15325409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Case-marking in the parsing of complement sentences: evidence from eye movements.
    Traxler MJ; Pickering MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Nov; 49(4):991-1004. PubMed ID: 8962544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural mechanisms of sentence comprehension based on predictive processes and decision certainty: Electrophysiological evidence from non-canonical linearizations in a flexible word order language.
    Dröge A; Fleischer J; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 1633():149-166. PubMed ID: 26740402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A hierarchical linear modeling analysis of working memory and implicit prosody in the resolution of adjunct attachment ambiguity.
    Traxler MJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2009 Oct; 38(5):491-509. PubMed ID: 19377881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Eye movement parameters in reading the sentences with syntactic ambiguity in Russian language].
    Anisimov VA; Fedorova OV; Latanov AV
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2014; 40(5):57-68. PubMed ID: 25711096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in the processing of anaphoric reference between closely related languages: neurophysiological evidence.
    Lamers MJ; Jansma BM; Hammer A; Münte TF
    BMC Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 9():55. PubMed ID: 18588672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: an analysis with event-related potentials.
    Mecklinger A; Schriefers H; Steinhauer K; Friederici AD
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jul; 23(4):477-94. PubMed ID: 7666761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ERPs reveal comparable syntactic sentence processing in native and non-native readers of English.
    Kotz SA; Holcomb PJ; Osterhout L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jul; 128(3):514-27. PubMed ID: 18061129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resolving sentence ambiguity with planning and working memory resources: Evidence from fMRI.
    Novais-Santos S; Gee J; Shah M; Troiani V; Work M; Grossman M
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(1):361-78. PubMed ID: 17574445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.