These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9564485)

  • 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: general principles and contemporary practices.
    Jorgensen JH; Ferraro MJ
    Clin Infect Dis; 1998 Apr; 26(4):973-80. PubMed ID: 9564485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae determined by a broth microdilution method.
    Herbst W; Schlez K; Heuser J; Baljer G
    Vet Rec; 2014 Apr; 174(15):382. PubMed ID: 24659031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and antimicrobial drug dosage.
    Prescott JF; Baggot JD
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1985 Aug; 187(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 4030470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Updating antimicrobial susceptibility testing: methods.
    Schofield CB
    Clin Lab Sci; 2012; 25(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 23330514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of a new Vitek 2 system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae.
    Abele-Horn M; Stoy K; Frosch M; Reinert RR
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2006 Jan; 25(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 16424974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Mycobacterium sp.
    Blanco-Ruano D; Roberts DM; Gonzalez-Del-Rio R; Álvarez D; Rebollo MJ; Pérez-Herrán E; Mendoza A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1285():257-68. PubMed ID: 25779321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Next-generation antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
    van Belkum A; Dunne WM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Jul; 51(7):2018-24. PubMed ID: 23486706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Review of immobilized antimicrobial agents and methods for testing.
    Green JB; Fulghum T; Nordhaus MA
    Biointerphases; 2011 Dec; 6(4):CL2-43. PubMed ID: 22239816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the MilliDrop technology.
    Jiang L; Boitard L; Broyer P; Chareire AC; Bourne-Branchu P; Mahé P; Tournoud M; Franceschi C; Zambardi G; Baudry J; Bibette J
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2016 Mar; 35(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 26803821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of biofilm model systems to study antimicrobial susceptibility.
    Pratten J; Ready D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 642():203-15. PubMed ID: 20401597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of novel cost-effective antimicrobial gradient strips for the determination of carbapenem susceptibility in Enterobacteriaceae.
    Sekar R; Srivani S; Lallitha S; Thenmozhi P; Devisri T; Amudhan M; Mythreyee M
    J Glob Antimicrob Resist; 2017 Mar; 8():97-101. PubMed ID: 28024980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Broth microdilution susceptibility testing of Brucella species: quality control limits for ten antimicrobial agents against three standard quality control strains.
    Brown SD; Traczewski MM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Nov; 43(11):5804-7. PubMed ID: 16272526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microbroth versus agar dilution for susceptibility testing of fluoroquinolones and other agents against anaerobic bacteria.
    Krepel CJ; Gohr CM; Edmiston CE; Condon RE
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1993 Oct; 32(4):571-5. PubMed ID: 8288498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a national EUCAST challenge panel for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
    Desmet S; Verhaegen J; Glupzcynski Y; Van Eldere J; Melin P; Goossens H; Piérard D; Declercq P; Lagrou K; Boel A; Cartuyvels R; Denis O; Vandewal W; Saegeman V
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2016 Aug; 22(8):704-10. PubMed ID: 27234934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simple and sensitive quality control method of the anaerobic atmosphere for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Justesen T; Justesen US
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2013 Jun; 76(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 23535206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 useful for monitoring broth microdilution tests of fluoroquinolones?
    Fuchs PC; Barry AL; Brown SD
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1997 Apr; 39(4):549-50. PubMed ID: 9145831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antimicrobial susceptibility breakpoints: PK-PD and susceptibility breakpoints.
    Ambrose PG
    Treat Respir Med; 2005; 4 Suppl 1():5-11. PubMed ID: 15846151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical appraisal of E test for the detection of fluoroquinolone resistance.
    Jones RN; Erwin ME; Croco JL
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1996 Jul; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 8858453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emerging Resistance, New Antimicrobial Agents  …  but No Tests! The Challenge of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in the Current US Regulatory Landscape.
    Humphries RM; Hindler JA
    Clin Infect Dis; 2016 Jul; 63(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 27025822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing breakpoints and methods from BSAC to EUCAST.
    Brown DF; Wootton M; Howe RA
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2016 Jan; 71(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 26377864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.