These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 956531)

  • 1. Individual differences in pure-tone localization.
    Russell G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1976 Jul; 60(1):270-2. PubMed ID: 956531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Underwater localization of click and pulsed pure-tone signals by the California sea lion (Zalophus californianus).
    Moore PW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1975 Feb; 57(2):406-10. PubMed ID: 1117093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Localization function and differential sensitivity of the auditory system in brain lesions].
    Al'tman IaA; L'vova VG; Petrova GM; Rozenblium AS
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1982; (4):50-5. PubMed ID: 6981875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Listening strategy for auditory rhythms modulates neural correlates of expectancy and cognitive processing.
    Snyder JS; Pasinski AC; McAuley JD
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Feb; 48(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 20557484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhanced spatial performance following 10 minutes exposure to music: a replication.
    Rideout BE; Taylor J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Aug; 85(1):112-4. PubMed ID: 9293565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shape constancy: dependence upon angle of rotation; individual differences.
    LICHTE WH
    J Exp Psychol; 1952 Jan; 43(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 14907991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Underwater localization of pulsed pure tones by the California sea lion(Zalophus californianus).
    Moore PW; Au WW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1975 Sep; 58(3):721-7. PubMed ID: 1184845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory psychophysics and perception.
    Hirsh IJ; Watson CS
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1996; 47():461-84. PubMed ID: 8624140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurements of time and space as manifestation of spatiotemporal organization of reflection.
    Romanov YA; Irikov OA
    Bull Exp Biol Med; 2002 Oct; 134(4):403-6. PubMed ID: 12533772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between individual differences in speech processing and cognitive functions.
    Ou J; Law SP; Fung R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1725-32. PubMed ID: 25917143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic spatiotemporal inhibition in the guinea pig auditory cortex.
    Kubota M; Sugimoto S; Horikawa J
    Neuroreport; 2008 Nov; 19(17):1691-4. PubMed ID: 18849882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the differences between localization and lateralization.
    Plenge G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1974 Sep; 56(3):944-51. PubMed ID: 4420742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory working memory predicts individual differences in absolute pitch learning.
    Van Hedger SC; Heald SL; Koch R; Nusbaum HC
    Cognition; 2015 Jul; 140():95-110. PubMed ID: 25909580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eye-movement-driven changes in the perception of auditory space.
    Collins T; Heed T; Röder B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):736-46. PubMed ID: 20348579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploration of a novel space is associated with individual differences in learning speed in black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus.
    Guillette LM; Reddon AR; Hurd PL; Sturdy CB
    Behav Processes; 2009 Nov; 82(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 19635531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effect of tone phase change on auditory localization (author's transl)].
    Gryczyńska D; Jatczak J; Latkowski B
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1980; 34(6):559-64. PubMed ID: 7208026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between two methods of response for auditory localization in the azimuth plane.
    Heyes AD; Perris AJ; Orlowski RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1975 Dec; 58(6):1336-9. PubMed ID: 1206168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binaural pinna disparity: another auditory localization cue.
    Searle CL; Braida LD; Cuddy DR; Davis MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1975 Feb; 57(2):448-55. PubMed ID: 1117098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Some determinants of localization-adaptation effects for successive auditory stimuli.
    Thurlow WR; Jack CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1973 Jun; 53(6):1573-7. PubMed ID: 4719254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.