These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9565885)

  • 1. Optimization of sire selection based on maximization of guaranteed income and risk associated with sire merit.
    Dematawewa CM; Berger PJ; Melton BE
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Mar; 81(3):807-16. PubMed ID: 9565885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating sire selection practices using lifetime net income functions.
    Cassell BG; Jobst SM; McGilliard ML; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Dec; 85(12):3492-502. PubMed ID: 12512623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of sire fertility and daughter stayability on profitability of sire selection.
    Ochoa RF; Taylor JF; Tomaszewski MA; Lacewell RD
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Nov; 74(11):3961-72. PubMed ID: 1757635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of longevity breeding values for US Holstein sires using survival analysis methodology.
    Caraviello DZ; Weigel KA; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Oct; 87(10):3518-25. PubMed ID: 15377631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic evaluation of Holstein sires and maternal grandsires in the United States for perinatal survival.
    Meyer CL; Berger PJ; Thompson JR; Sattler CG
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 May; 84(5):1246-54. PubMed ID: 11384052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between a Weibull proportional hazards model and a linear model for predicting the genetic merit of US Jersey sires for daughter longevity.
    Caraviello DZ; Weigel KA; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 May; 87(5):1469-76. PubMed ID: 15290996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sire predicted transmitting ability for conformation and yield traits and previous lactation incidence of foot lesions as risk factors for the incidence of foot lesions in Holstein cows.
    Oikonomou G; Cook NB; Bicalho RC
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jun; 96(6):3713-22. PubMed ID: 23567054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genotype x environment interaction for grazing versus confinement. I. Production traits.
    Kearney JF; Schutz MM; Boettcher PJ; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Feb; 87(2):501-9. PubMed ID: 14762093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of controlling instruments for improvements in cow sire selection.
    König S; Lessner S; Simianer H
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Apr; 90(4):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17369238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Threshold model analysis of dystocia in dairy cattle when progeny information is limited.
    Clutter AC; Berger PJ; Mattison JM
    J Dairy Sci; 1989 Dec; 72(12):3264-72. PubMed ID: 2628446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic prediction for calving ease in the United States: data, models, and use by the dairy industry.
    Berger PJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Apr; 77(4):1146-53. PubMed ID: 8201049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Weighting factors of sire daughter information in international genetic evaluations.
    Fikse WF; Banos G
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Jul; 84(7):1759-67. PubMed ID: 11467826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationships of sire predicted transmitting ability for somatic cell score with measures of daughter performance.
    Cranford JL; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Jun; 84(6):1501-7. PubMed ID: 11417710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of genotype effects for milk proteins with animal and sire transmitting ability models.
    Famula TR; Medrano JF
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Oct; 77(10):3153-62. PubMed ID: 7836604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Holsteins selected for high and average milk production. 1. Net income and production response to selection for milk.
    Dunklee JS; Freeman AE; Kelley DH
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jul; 77(7):1890-6. PubMed ID: 7929950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic evaluation of dairy sires for milking duration using electronically recorded milking times of their daughters.
    Zwald NR; Weigel KA; Chang YM; Welper RD; Clay JS
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Mar; 88(3):1192-8. PubMed ID: 15738252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic evaluations of dairy bulls for daughter energy balance profiles using linear type scores and body condition score analyzed using random regression.
    Coffey MP; Simm G; Hill WG; Brotherstone S
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Jun; 86(6):2205-12. PubMed ID: 12836957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic selection for health traits using producer-recorded data. II. Genetic correlations, disease probabilities, and relationships with existing traits.
    Zwald NR; Weigel KA; Chang YM; Welper RD; Clay JS
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Dec; 87(12):4295-302. PubMed ID: 15545393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictability of bull merit from genetic evaluations of sires and maternal grandsires using an animal model.
    Rekik B; Berger PJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 May; 80(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 9178137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.