These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9566158)

  • 1. Twin Block appliance. Part II.
    Rondeau B
    Funct Orthod; 1996; 13(2):4-10, 12-6. PubMed ID: 9566158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The twin block appliance.
    Rondeau B
    Funct Orthod; 1995; 12(2):6-14, 16-21. PubMed ID: 8613116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Herbst Appliance fixed-functional appliance Class II skeletal malocclusion.
    Rondeau B
    J Gen Orthod; 2001; 12(3):7-17. PubMed ID: 11692451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance.
    Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10893470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-phase treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion with the combination of the twin-block appliance and high-pull headgear.
    Lv Y; Yan B; Wang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):246-55. PubMed ID: 22858335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 2. Soft tissue changes.
    Sharma AA; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 15821692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Case report: Rick-a-Nator.
    Rondeau BH
    J Gen Orthod; 1992 Sep; 3(3):24-6. PubMed ID: 1450284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Class II malocclusion: why, when and how to treat this anomaly in mixed dentition with fixed functional appliances.
    Ritto AK
    J Gen Orthod; 2001; 12(4):9-21. PubMed ID: 11822159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects.
    O'Brien K; Wright J; Conboy F; Sanjie Y; Mandall N; Chadwick S; Connolly I; Cook P; Birnie D; Hammond M; Harradine N; Lewis D; McDade C; Mitchell L; Murray A; O'Neill J; Read M; Robinson S; Roberts-Harry D; Sandler J; Shaw I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Sep; 124(3):234-43; quiz 339. PubMed ID: 12970656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rick-A-Nator appliance.
    Rondeau BH
    J Gen Orthod; 1992 Mar; 3(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 1450274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The Bimler method in the treatment of sagittal shift of the skeletal base in Class II division 1 malocclusion].
    Barthelemy I; Aussenac J; Barthelemy R; Cadenat H; Boutault F; Fabie M
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1998 Nov; 99(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 10088186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes.
    Gill DS; Lee RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):465-72; quiz 517. PubMed ID: 15821691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MARA appliance.
    Rondeau B
    Funct Orthod; 2002; 19(2):4-12, 14-6. PubMed ID: 12192852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 2 modifications of the twin-block appliance in matched Class II samples.
    Parkin NA; McKeown HF; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 11395699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment of developing Class II Division 1 malocclusion with Jumper Twin Block.
    Hammad SM; Bashir ES; El-Bialy AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 22873025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Treatment effects of magnetic Twin-block appliance for class II cases].
    Wu JY; Liu J; Li QS; Xu TM; Lin JX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 42(9):519-24. PubMed ID: 18070424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.