These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9566175)

  • 21. Compliance with mammography guidelines: physician recommendation and patient adherence.
    May DS; Kiefe CI; Funkhouser E; Fouad MN
    Prev Med; 1999 Apr; 28(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 10090868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measuring mammography compliance: lessons learned from a survival analysis of screening behavior.
    Partin MR; Casey-Paal AL; Slater JS; Korn JE
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1998 Aug; 7(8):681-7. PubMed ID: 9718220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adherence to recent screening mammography among Latinas: findings from the California Women's Health Survey.
    Mack KP; Pavao J; Tabnak F; Knutson K; Kimerling R
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Mar; 18(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 19281318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Adherence to screening guidelines for breast and cervical cancer in postmenopausal women with coronary heart disease: an ancillary study of volunteers for hers.
    Castellano PZ; Wenger NK; Graves WL
    J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2001 Jun; 10(5):451-61. PubMed ID: 11445044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.
    Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; Menon U; Daggy J
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Oct; 13(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 15671706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improving compliance with breast cancer screening in older women. Results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Herman CJ; Speroff T; Cebul RD
    Arch Intern Med; 1995 Apr; 155(7):717-22. PubMed ID: 7695460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nonparticipation in mammography screening: apathy, anxiety or cost?
    Munn EM
    N Z Med J; 1993 Jul; 106(959):284-6. PubMed ID: 8321446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Screening mammography use: the importance of a population perspective.
    McCarthy BD; Yood MU; MacWilliam CH; Lee MJ
    Am J Prev Med; 1996; 12(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 8777073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Screening mammography: a missed clinical opportunity? Results of the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium and National Health Interview Survey Studies.
    JAMA; 1990 Jul; 264(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 2355430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mammography diffusion and trends in late-stage breast cancer: evaluating outcomes in a population.
    Taplin SH; Mandelson MT; Anderman C; White E; Thompson RS; Timlin D; Wagner EH
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1997 Aug; 6(8):625-31. PubMed ID: 9264276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of continuing medical education and cost reduction on physician compliance with mammography screening guidelines.
    Lane DS; Polednak AP; Burg MA
    J Fam Pract; 1991 Oct; 33(4):359-68. PubMed ID: 1919452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of physician and patient characteristics on adherence to breast cancer screening recommendations.
    Abdel-Malek N; Chiarelli AM; Sloan M; Stewart DE; Mai V; Howlett RI
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Feb; 17(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 18090910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Breast cancer screening complacency and compliance.
    Maurer WJ
    Wis Med J; 1995; 94(6):305-6. PubMed ID: 7625089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Another round in the mammography controversy.
    Meissner HI; Rimer BK; Davis WW; Eisner EJ; Siegler IC
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Apr; 12(3):261-76. PubMed ID: 12804357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Benefits and costs of screening and treatment for early breast cancer. Development of a basic benefit package.
    Kattlove H; Liberati A; Keeler E; Brook RH
    JAMA; 1995 Jan; 273(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 7799495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Randomized controlled trial of mammography intervention in insured very low-income women.
    Ahmed NU; Haber G; Semenya KA; Hargreaves MK
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 Jul; 19(7):1790-8. PubMed ID: 20587669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Feasibility of universal screening mammography. Lessons from a community intervention.
    Costanza ME; D'Orsi CJ; Greene HL; Gaw VP; Karellas A; Zapka JG
    Arch Intern Med; 1991 Sep; 151(9):1851-6. PubMed ID: 1888252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does supply influence mammography screening?
    Khan N; Kaestner R; Salmon JW; Gutierrez B
    Am J Health Behav; 2010; 34(4):465-75. PubMed ID: 20218758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Privacy or life: how do women find out about screening mammography services?
    Brunton M; Thomas DR
    N Z Med J; 2002 Sep; 115(1161):U168. PubMed ID: 12386675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.