These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9566175)

  • 41. The Effect of the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations on Mammography Rates.
    Gray N; Picone G
    Health Serv Res; 2016 Aug; 51(4):1533-45. PubMed ID: 26800299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mammography stages of change in middle-aged women with schizophrenia: an exploratory analysis.
    Lindamer LA; Wear E; Sadler GR
    BMC Psychiatry; 2006 Oct; 6():49. PubMed ID: 17074091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Enhancing mammography use in the inner city. A randomized trial of intensive case management.
    Weber BE; Reilly BM
    Arch Intern Med; 1997 Nov; 157(20):2345-9. PubMed ID: 9361575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Adherence to Multiple Cancer Screening Tests among Women Living in Appalachia Ohio.
    Katz ML; Reiter PL; Young GS; Pennell ML; Tatum CM; Paskett ED
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 Oct; 24(10):1489-94. PubMed ID: 26282630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Mammography screening: how important is cost as a barrier to use?
    Urban N; Anderson GL; Peacock S
    Am J Public Health; 1994 Jan; 84(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 8279611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Academic-community partnership development lessons learned: evidence-based interventions to increase screening mammography in rural communities.
    Lee-Lin F; Domenico LJ; Ogden LA; Fromwiller V; Magathan N; Vail S; Gorman PN
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2014; 29(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 24901547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Two sequential randomized trials of community participation to recruit women for mammographic screening.
    Clover K; Redman S; Forbes J; Sanson-Fisher R; Callaghan T
    Prev Med; 1996; 25(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 8860277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Do nonattenders in mammography screening programmes seek mammography elsewhere?
    Jensen A; Olsen AH; von Euler-Chelpin M; Helle Njor S; Vejborg I; Lynge E
    Int J Cancer; 2005 Jan; 113(3):464-70. PubMed ID: 15455383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Increasing breast-cancer screening uptake: A randomized controlled experiment.
    Goldzahl L; Hollard G; Jusot F
    J Health Econ; 2018 Mar; 58():228-252. PubMed ID: 29571095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Can postal prompts from general practitioners improve the uptake of breast screening? A randomised controlled trial in one east London general practice.
    O'Connor AM; Griffiths CJ; Underwood MR; Eldridge S
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 9575461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Examining barriers for mammography screening compliance within a private hospital and an underserved primary care clinic in Santiago, Chile.
    Wood MF; Vial MC; Martinez-Gutierrez J; Mason MJ; Puschel K
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Dec; 10(12):966-71. PubMed ID: 24295948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Repeat mammography: prevalence estimates and considerations for assessment.
    Clark MA; Rakowski W; Bonacore LB
    Ann Behav Med; 2003 Dec; 26(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 14644696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Breast cancer screening and compliance and evaluation of lesions.
    Schapira DV; Levine RB
    Med Clin North Am; 1996 Jan; 80(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 8569294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Compliance with mammography screening guidelines: 1995 Mammography Attitudes and Usage Study Report.
    Horton JA; Cruess DF; Romans MC
    Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(5):239-45. PubMed ID: 8870502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Compliance with mammography recommendations at the work site.
    Goodspeed RB; DeLucia AG; Parravano J; Goldfield N
    J Occup Med; 1988 Jan; 30(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 3351640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cost-benefit analysis and mammographic screening: a travel cost approach.
    Clarke PM
    J Health Econ; 1998 Dec; 17(6):767-87. PubMed ID: 10339252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Screening for breast cancer. Screen women over 65.
    Sutton GC; Balmer S
    BMJ; 1994 Sep; 309(6955):664. PubMed ID: 7802794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Overdiagnosis and screening mammography.
    Vazquez-Caruncho M
    Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):727-8; author reply 728-9. PubMed ID: 22282189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of a transportation incentive on compliance with the first prenatal appointment: a randomized trial.
    Melnikow J; Paliescheskey M; Stewart GK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 89(6):1023-7. PubMed ID: 9170485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Underuse of long-term routine hospital follow-up care in patients with a history of breast cancer?
    Lu W; Jansen L; Schaapveld M; Baas PC; Wiggers T; De Bock GH
    BMC Cancer; 2011 Jun; 11():279. PubMed ID: 21708039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.