These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9567642)

  • 1. Can digital examination substitute anorectal manometry for the evaluation of anal canal pressures?
    Buch E; Alós R; Solana A; Roig JV; Fernández C; Díaz F
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1998 Feb; 90(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 9567642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anorectal function in patients with complete rectal prolapse. Differences between continent and incontinent individuals.
    Roig JV; Buch E; Alós R; Solana A; Fernández C; Villoslada C; García-Armengol J; Hinojosa J
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1998 Nov; 90(11):794-805. PubMed ID: 9866412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fecal incontinence. Studies on physiology, pathophysiology and surgical treatment.
    Rasmussen OØ
    Dan Med Bull; 2003 Aug; 50(3):262-82. PubMed ID: 13677243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posterior vaginal wall prolapse does not correlate with fecal symptoms or objective measures of anorectal function.
    da Silva GM; Gurland B; Sleemi A; Levy G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Dec; 195(6):1742-7. PubMed ID: 17132476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Manometric evaluation of defecation disorders: Part II. Fecal incontinence.
    Rao SS
    Gastroenterologist; 1997 Jun; 5(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 9193928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A manometric study of anorectal function after surgery for anal fistula, with special reference to incontinence.
    Sainio P
    Acta Chir Scand; 1985; 151(8):695-700. PubMed ID: 4096174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The digital rectal examination scoring system (DRESS).
    Orkin BA; Sinykin SB; Lloyd PC
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Dec; 53(12):1656-60. PubMed ID: 21178861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the digital rectal examination as an estimate of anal sphincter squeeze pressure.
    Kaushal JN; Goldner F
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1991 Jul; 86(7):886-7. PubMed ID: 2058632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of anorectal manometry during rectal infusion of saline to investigate sphincter function in incontinent patients.
    Read NW; Haynes WG; Bartolo DC; Hall J; Read MG; Donnelly TC; Johnson AG
    Gastroenterology; 1983 Jul; 85(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 6852445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anorectal manometry in women with urinary stress incontinence.
    Kjølhede P; Hallböök O; Rydén G; Sjödahl R
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1997 Mar; 76(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 9093143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The physical properties of rectal contents have effects on anorectal continence: insights from a study into the cause of fecal spotting on orlistat.
    Fox M; Schwizer W; Menne D; Stutz B; Fried M; Thumshirn M
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Dec; 47(12):2147-56. PubMed ID: 15657667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fistulotomy with primary sphincter reconstruction in the management of complex fistula-in-ano: prospective study of clinical and manometric results.
    Perez F; Arroyo A; Serrano P; Candela F; Sanchez A; Calpena R
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Jun; 200(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 15922203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determinants of fecal continence in healthy, continent subjects: a comprehensive analysis by anal manometry, rectal barostat and a stool substitute retention test.
    Fox M; Thumshirn M; Frühauf H; Fried M; Schwizer W
    Digestion; 2011; 83(1-2):46-53. PubMed ID: 20847563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical, anorectal manometry and surface electromyography in the study of patients with fecal incontinence.
    Muñoz Yagüe T; Alvarez Sánchez V; Ibáñez Pinto A; Solís- Herruzo JA
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2003 Sep; 95(9):635-9, 629-34. PubMed ID: 14738408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience.
    Azpiroz F; Enck P; Whitehead WE
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Feb; 97(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 11866256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Anal incontinence in patients with rectal neoplasms previous to surgical intervention].
    DeMiguel M; Ortíz H; Garrido JR; Morales G; Armendáriz P
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1996 Jan; 88(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8615997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Traditional measures of normal anal sphincter function using high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) in 115 healthy volunteers.
    Carrington EV; Brokjaer A; Craven H; Zarate N; Horrocks EJ; Palit S; Jackson W; Duthie GS; Knowles CH; Lunniss PJ; Scott SM
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2014 May; 26(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 24628873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. To what extent are anorectal function tests comparable? A study comparing digital rectal examination, anal electromyography, 3-dimensional high-resolution anal manometry, and transperineal ultrasound.
    Dekker L; van Reijn-Baggen DA; Han-Geurts IJM; Felt-Bersma RJF
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Jan; 38(1):12. PubMed ID: 36645523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative evaluation of the anal sphincter by the tendency presented in the manometric asymmetry variations.
    Xiao Y; Liu G
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2002 Mar; 115(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 11940378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Manometric tests of anorectal function in healthy adults.
    Rao SS; Hatfield R; Soffer E; Rao S; Beaty J; Conklin JL
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Mar; 94(3):773-83. PubMed ID: 10086665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.