These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 956790)
1. An experimental analysis of the Chevreul pendulum illusion. Easton RD; Shor RE J Gen Psychol; 1976 Jul; 95(1st Half):111-25. PubMed ID: 956790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Information processing analysis of the Chevreul pendulum illusion. Easton RD; Shor RE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Aug; 1(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 1202145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Augmented and Delayed Feedback in the Chevreul Pendulum Illusion. Easton RD; Shor RE J Gen Psychol; 1977 Oct; 97(2):167-177. PubMed ID: 28136225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Moving objects by imagination? Amount of finger movement and pendulum length determine success in the Chevreul pendulum illusion. Cantergi D; Awasthi B; Friedman J Hum Mov Sci; 2021 Dec; 80():102879. PubMed ID: 34607165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of subject arm position and initial experience on Chevreul pendulum responses. Montgomery G; Kirsch I Am J Clin Hypn; 1996 Jan; 38(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 8712161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of attention on early cortical processes associated with the sound-induced extra flash illusion. Mishra J; Martínez A; Hillyard SA J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1714-29. PubMed ID: 19583464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Responding and failing to respond to both hypnosis and a kinesthetic illusion, Chevreul's Pendulum. Karlin RA; Hill A; Messer S Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2008 Jan; 56(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 18058489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory and visual attention-based apparent motion share functional parallels. Huddleston WE; Lewis JW; Phinney RE; DeYoe EA Percept Psychophys; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1207-16. PubMed ID: 18927004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endogenous attention and illusory line motion depend on task set. Chica AB; Charras P; Lupiáñez J Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2251-9. PubMed ID: 18639573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Kinesthetic illusory feeling induced by a finger movement movie effects on corticomotor excitability. Kaneko F; Yasojima T; Kizuka T Neuroscience; 2007 Nov; 149(4):976-84. PubMed ID: 17935897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of visual illusions on grasping. Franz VH; Fahle M; Bülthoff HH; Gegenfurtner KR J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Oct; 27(5):1124-44. PubMed ID: 11642699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tactile flow explains haptic counterparts of common visual illusions. Bicchi A; Scilingo EP; Ricciardi E; Pietrini P Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):737-41. PubMed ID: 18394519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Grasping the diagonal: controlling attention to illusory stimuli for action and perception. Stöttinger E; Aigner S; Hanstein K; Perner J Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):223-8. PubMed ID: 18508282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An opaque surface influences the depth from the Pulfrich phenomenon. Kham K Perception; 2004; 33(10):1201-13. PubMed ID: 15693665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Magnocellular visual pathway and the flash-lag illusion. Chappell M; Mullen KT J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(11):24. PubMed ID: 20884519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Human limb-specific and non-limb-specific brain representations during kinesthetic illusory movements of the upper and lower extremities. Naito E; Nakashima T; Kito T; Aramaki Y; Okada T; Sadato N Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(11):3476-87. PubMed ID: 17553017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The perception of real and illusory motion in schizophrenia. Crawford TJ; Hamm JP; Kean M; Schmechtig A; Kumari V; Anilkumar AP; Ettinger U Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):3121-7. PubMed ID: 20600182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Judgments of synchrony between auditory and moving or still visual stimuli. Fouriezos G; Capstick G; Monette F; Bellemare C; Parkinson M; Dumoulin A Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):277-92. PubMed ID: 18266504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors influencing audiovisual fission and fusion illusions. Andersen TS; Tiippana K; Sams M Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Nov; 21(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 15511646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Roll, pitch, longitudinal and yaw vection visually induced by optical flow in flight simulation conditions. Frigon JY; Delorme A Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 1):935-55. PubMed ID: 1608732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]