These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9569870)

  • 1. Improvements in impression materials give more predictable results.
    Strassler HE
    MSDA J; 1996; 39(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9569870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dimensional accuracy of 3 silicone dental impression materials.
    Hassan AK
    East Mediterr Health J; 2006 Sep; 12(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 17333804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [On the dimension behavior of various impression materials from the point of view of their suitability for correction impression technics].
    Hofmann M; Ludwig P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1968 Apr; 23(4):438-49. PubMed ID: 4871434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical trial and laboratory testing of a new impression material for edentulous mandibles].
    Stein H; Ebersbach W
    Dtsch Stomatol; 1967 Jul; 17(7):508-17. PubMed ID: 4860646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A predictable and accurate technique with elastomeric impression materials.
    Barghi N; Ontiveros JC
    Am J Dent; 1999 Aug; 12(4):161-3. PubMed ID: 10649919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Experimental testing of physical properties of impression materials for edentulous jaw in various processing conditions].
    Welker D; Hopf C; Rothamel G
    Dtsch Stomatol; 1973 Oct; 23(10):725-42. PubMed ID: 4588554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Section impression--a technical evaluation of materials].
    Oilo G
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1973 Jan; 83(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 4570395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concepts in impressions for dental implantology.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1994; 5(2):11-6. PubMed ID: 9571825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Sources of error in various impression technics in the dental practice].
    Plischka G; Sorger F
    Osterr Z Stomatol; 1970; 67(6):207-14. PubMed ID: 4912793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Studies on the use of alginate impression material and the dependence of the results on various processing conditions. 1. Problems of processing; comparative testing of various measuring methods].
    Welker D
    Stomatol DDR; 1974 Apr; 24(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 4599731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Testing of shape and reproduction precision of impression materials].
    Schwickerath H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Jun; 27(6):478-84. PubMed ID: 4555479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Myodynamic impression technics. Study of reproducibility II].
    Karlsson S; Hedegård B
    Tandlakartidningen; 1976 Aug; 68(15-16):846-9. PubMed ID: 802434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Guidelines for accurate impression-making techniques.
    Gennaro R
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 16(9):634, 636. PubMed ID: 15597526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative laboratory study of Coe-comfort, Coe-soft and Ivoseal as impression materials].
    Erhardson S; Johansson EG
    Sven Tandlak Tidskr; 1970 Sep; 63(9):633-45. PubMed ID: 4919523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.