313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9571028)
21. Ab initio computational modeling of loops in G-protein-coupled receptors: lessons from the crystal structure of rhodopsin.
Mehler EL; Hassan SA; Kortagere S; Weinstein H
Proteins; 2006 Aug; 64(3):673-90. PubMed ID: 16729264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Development of an ab initio protein structure prediction system ABLE.
Ishida T; Nishimura T; Nozaki M; Inoue T; Terada T; Nakamura S; Shimizu K
Genome Inform; 2003; 14():228-37. PubMed ID: 15706537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Method for comparing the structures of protein ligand-binding sites and application for predicting protein-drug interactions.
Minai R; Matsuo Y; Onuki H; Hirota H
Proteins; 2008 Jul; 72(1):367-81. PubMed ID: 18214952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Protein imperfections: separating intrinsic from extrinsic variation of torsion angles.
Butterfoss GL; Richardson JS; Hermans J
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2005 Jan; 61(Pt 1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15608380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Active site structures and the redox properties of blue copper proteins: atomic resolution structure of azurin II and electronic structure calculations of azurin, plastocyanin and stellacyanin.
Paraskevopoulos K; Sundararajan M; Surendran R; Hough MA; Eady RR; Hillier IH; Hasnain SS
Dalton Trans; 2006 Jul; (25):3067-76. PubMed ID: 16786065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Disallowed Ramachandran conformations of amino acid residues in protein structures.
Gunasekaran K; Ramakrishnan C; Balaram P
J Mol Biol; 1996 Nov; 264(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 8950277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. De novo protein design. I. In search of stability and specificity.
Koehl P; Levitt M
J Mol Biol; 1999 Nov; 293(5):1161-81. PubMed ID: 10547293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. PDB-based protein loop prediction: parameters for selection and methods for optimization.
van Vlijmen HW; Karplus M
J Mol Biol; 1997 Apr; 267(4):975-1001. PubMed ID: 9135125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effective connectivity profile: a structural representation that evidences the relationship between protein structures and sequences.
Bastolla U; Ortíz AR; Porto M; Teichert F
Proteins; 2008 Dec; 73(4):872-88. PubMed ID: 18536008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Solvation parameters for predicting the structure of surface loops in proteins: transferability and entropic effects.
Das B; Meirovitch H
Proteins; 2003 May; 51(3):470-83. PubMed ID: 12696057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Determining the three-dimensional fold of a protein from approximate constraints: a simulation study.
Soman KV; Braun W
Cell Biochem Biophys; 2001; 34(3):283-304. PubMed ID: 11898858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Refinement of protein crystal structures using energy restraints derived from linear-scaling quantum mechanics.
Yu N; Yennawar HP; Merz KM
Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2005 Mar; 61(Pt 3):322-32. PubMed ID: 15735343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Characterization of protein fold by wide-angle X-ray solution scattering.
Makowski L; Rodi DJ; Mandava S; Devarapalli S; Fischetti RF
J Mol Biol; 2008 Nov; 383(3):731-44. PubMed ID: 18786543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. I. Protein structural alignment and a quantitative measure for protein structural distance.
Yang AS; Honig B
J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):665-78. PubMed ID: 10966776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Examining methods for calculations of binding free energies: LRA, LIE, PDLD-LRA, and PDLD/S-LRA calculations of ligands binding to an HIV protease.
Sham YY; Chu ZT; Tao H; Warshel A
Proteins; 2000 Jun; 39(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 10813821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles.
Lüthy R; Bowie JU; Eisenberg D
Nature; 1992 Mar; 356(6364):83-5. PubMed ID: 1538787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Local interactions in protein folding determined through an inverse folding model.
Bastolla U; Porto M; Ortíz AR
Proteins; 2008 Apr; 71(1):278-99. PubMed ID: 17932940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding.
Liu S; Zhang C; Zhou H; Zhou Y
Proteins; 2004 Jul; 56(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 15162489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A large data set comparison of protein structures determined by crystallography and NMR: statistical test for structural differences and the effect of crystal packing.
Andrec M; Snyder DA; Zhou Z; Young J; Montelione GT; Levy RM
Proteins; 2007 Nov; 69(3):449-65. PubMed ID: 17623851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. De novo protein design. II. Plasticity in sequence space.
Koehl P; Levitt M
J Mol Biol; 1999 Nov; 293(5):1183-93. PubMed ID: 10547294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
