These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9571347)

  • 21. Evaluation of Roche Accu-Chek Go and Medisense Optium blood glucose meters.
    Hawkins RC
    Clin Chim Acta; 2005 Mar; 353(1-2):127-31. PubMed ID: 15698599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Short-term evaluation of an electro-chemical system (ExacTech) for blood glucose monitoring.
    Ross D; Heinemann L; Chantelau EA
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 1990; 10(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 2073875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of simulated altitude on blood glucose meter performance: implications for in-flight blood glucose monitoring.
    Olateju T; Begley J; Flanagan D; Kerr D
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 6(4):867-74. PubMed ID: 22920813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of newer-generation home blood glucose meters in a Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) inpatient exercise study.
    Weinzimer SA; Beck RW; Chase HP; Fox LA; Buckingham BA; Tamborlane WV; Kollman C; Coffey J; Xing D; Ruedy KJ;
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Oct; 7(5):675-80; discussion 681-3. PubMed ID: 16241867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the effects of insufficient blood volume samples on the performance of blood glucose self-test meters.
    Pfützner A; Schipper C; Ramljak S; Flacke F; Sieber J; Forst T; Musholt PB
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 7(6):1522-9. PubMed ID: 24351178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical and statistical evaluation of self-monitoring blood glucose meters.
    Poirier JY; Le Prieur N; Campion L; Guilhem I; Allannic H; Maugendre D
    Diabetes Care; 1998 Nov; 21(11):1919-24. PubMed ID: 9802744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy and precision evaluation of seven self-monitoring blood glucose systems.
    Kuo CY; Hsu CT; Ho CS; Su TE; Wu MH; Wang CJ
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 May; 13(5):596-600. PubMed ID: 21406013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of point-of-care-testing glucose meters with standard laboratory measurement of the 50g-glucose-challenge test (GCT) during pregnancy.
    Buhling KJ; Henrich W; Kjos SL; Siebert G; Starr E; Dreweck C; Stein U; Dudenhausen JW
    Clin Biochem; 2003 Jul; 36(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 12849863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Three new glucose reflectance meters: Diascan, Glucometer II, and Reflolux II.
    Thai AC; Ng WY; Lui KF; Yeo PP
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 1989 Jun; 7(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 2752892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical evaluation of the eBsensor hand-held blood glucose monitoring system.
    Chen CC; Tai DY; Ho P; Lai YK; Lin JJ; Mao SJ; Lin CC; Hsieh YC; Chiang HC; Dai KS
    Clin Chim Acta; 2007 Feb; 377(1-2):170-3. PubMed ID: 17097079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Laboratory and bedside evaluation of portable glucose meters.
    Nichols JH; Howard C; Loman K; Miller C; Nyberg D; Chan DW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Feb; 103(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 7856571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The use of portable blood glucose monitors by trained lay operators.
    Campbell EM; Redman S; Dunkley PR; Moffitt PS
    Med J Aust; 1992 Oct; 157(7):446-8. PubMed ID: 1406392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interference studies with two hospital-grade and two home-grade glucose meters.
    Lyon ME; Baskin LB; Braakman S; Presti S; Dubois J; Shirey T
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Oct; 11(10):641-7. PubMed ID: 19821756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigation on the accuracy of the blood glucose monitoring device Prestige IQ.
    Larbig M; Forst T; Mondok A; Forst S; Pfützner A
    Diabetes Nutr Metab; 2003 Aug; 16(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 14768776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The surveillance error grid.
    Klonoff DC; Lias C; Vigersky R; Clarke W; Parkes JL; Sacks DB; Kirkman MS; Kovatchev B;
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 8(4):658-72. PubMed ID: 25562886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Technical note: Glucose concentration in dairy cows measured using 6 handheld meters designed for human use.
    Lopes RB; Valldecabres A; Silva-Del-Río N
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Oct; 102(10):9401-9408. PubMed ID: 31378495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of two glucose meters for the neonatal intensive care unit.
    Perkins SL; Doelle H; Escares E; Forsythe J; Pronovost C; Taylor-Clapp S
    Clin Biochem; 1998 Mar; 31(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 9622768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Comparison of the accuracy and precision of 7 reflectometers in self-control of blood glucose].
    Regal H; Zdolsek I; Irsigler K
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1989 Feb; 139(3):56-61. PubMed ID: 2705325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of a new blood glucose reflectance meter and comparison with visually interpreted strips.
    Kalk WJ; Constable J; Osler C; Rowe P
    S Afr Med J; 1985 Mar; 67(11):407-9. PubMed ID: 3983718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of the accuracy of glucose reflectance meters in pregnant insulin-dependent diabetics.
    Harkness LJ; Ashwood ER; Parsons S; Lenke RR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Feb; 77(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 1988877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.