227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9571620)
1. Computerized characterization of masses on mammograms: the rubber band straightening transform and texture analysis.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1998 Apr; 25(4):516-26. PubMed ID: 9571620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of machine learning in projection views and reconstructed slices.
Chan HP; Wu YT; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhang Y; Moore RH; Kopans DB; Hadjiiski L; Way T
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3576-86. PubMed ID: 20831065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Design of a high-sensitivity classifier based on a genetic algorithm: application to computer-aided diagnosis.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Oct; 43(10):2853-71. PubMed ID: 9814523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass CAD system.
Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 15259655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: multiresolution texture analysis.
Wei D; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Sahiner B; Petrick N; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1995 Sep; 22(9):1501-13. PubMed ID: 8531882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis.
Wei D; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 9198026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space.
Chan HP; Wei D; Helvie MA; Sahiner B; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM; Petrick N
Phys Med Biol; 1995 May; 40(5):857-76. PubMed ID: 7652012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses.
Varela C; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):425-41. PubMed ID: 16394348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improvement of mammographic mass characterization using spiculation meausures and morphological features.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1455-65. PubMed ID: 11488579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gradient and texture analysis for the classification of mammographic masses.
Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Oct; 19(10):1032-43. PubMed ID: 11131493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Usefulness of texture analysis for computerized classification of breast lesions on mammograms.
Pereira RR; Azevedo Marques PM; Honda MO; Kinoshita SK; Engelmann R; Muramatsu C; Doi K
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 17122993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules on CT scans: segmentation and classification using 3D active contours.
Way TW; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Kazerooni EA; Bogot N; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2323-37. PubMed ID: 16898434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A ranklet-based image representation for mass classification in digital mammograms.
Masotti M
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3951-61. PubMed ID: 17089857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer diagnosis: analyzing texture of tissue surrounding microcalcifications.
Karahaliou AN; Boniatis IS; Skiadopoulos SG; Sakellaropoulos FN; Arikidis NS; Likaki EA; Panayiotakis GS; Costaridou LI
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2008 Nov; 12(6):731-8. PubMed ID: 19000952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Lam KL; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Mar; 42(3):549-67. PubMed ID: 9080535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative characterization of mass lesions on digitized mammograms for computer-assisted diagnosis.
Leichter I; Buchbinder S; Bamberger P; Novak B; Fields S; Lederman R
Invest Radiol; 2000 Jun; 35(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 10853611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
