These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9572523)

  • 1. High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner.
    Qi J; Leahy RM; Cherry SR; Chatziioannou A; Farquhar TH
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Apr; 43(4):1001-13. PubMed ID: 9572523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resolution and noise properties of MAP reconstruction for fully 3-D PET.
    Qi J; Leahy RM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 May; 19(5):493-506. PubMed ID: 11021692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MicroPET II: design, development and initial performance of an improved microPET scanner for small-animal imaging.
    Tai YC; Chatziioannou AF; Yang Y; Silverman RW; Meadors K; Siegel S; Newport DF; Stickel JR; Cherry SR
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jun; 48(11):1519-37. PubMed ID: 12817935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Investigation of the resolution and count recovery coefficients of a whole-body PET scanner (Shimadzu SET-2400W) in 2D and 3D mode image].
    Watanuki S; Fujiwara T; Ishii K; Miyake M; Itoh M; Kitamura K
    Kaku Igaku; 2000 Jan; 37(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 10714066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Iterative reconstruction of Fourier-rebinned PET data using sinogram blurring function estimated from point source scans.
    Tohme MS; Qi J
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5530-40. PubMed ID: 21089788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative comparison of FBP, EM, and Bayesian reconstruction algorithms for the IndyPET scanner.
    Frese T; Rouze NC; Bouman CA; Sauer K; Hutchins GD
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):258-76. PubMed ID: 12716002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance evaluation of the microPET R4 PET scanner for rodents.
    Knoess C; Siegel S; Smith A; Newport D; Richerzhagen N; Winkeler A; Jacobs A; Goble RN; Graf R; Wienhard K; Heiss WD
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 May; 30(5):737-47. PubMed ID: 12536244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging.
    Chatziioannou AF; Cherry SR; Shao Y; Silverman RW; Meadors K; Farquhar TH; Pedarsani M; Phelps ME
    J Nucl Med; 1999 Jul; 40(7):1164-75. PubMed ID: 10405138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A penalized-likelihood image reconstruction method for emission tomography, compared to postsmoothed maximum-likelihood with matched spatial resolution.
    Nuyts J; Fessler JA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Sep; 22(9):1042-52. PubMed ID: 12956260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved resolution for PET volume imaging through three-dimensional iterative reconstruction.
    Liow JS; Strother SC; Rehm K; Rottenberg DA
    J Nucl Med; 1997 Oct; 38(10):1623-31. PubMed ID: 9379203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of compensation for scattering angular uncertainty in analytical Compton camera reconstruction.
    Hirasawa M; Tomitani T
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 May; 49(10):2083-93. PubMed ID: 15214543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance evaluation of a high-resolution brain PET scanner using four-layer MPPC DOI detectors.
    Watanabe M; Saito A; Isobe T; Ote K; Yamada R; Moriya T; Omura T
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):7148-7166. PubMed ID: 28753133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging characteristics of a 3-dimensional GSO whole-body PET camera.
    Surti S; Karp JS
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Jun; 45(6):1040-9. PubMed ID: 15181139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compensation for nonuniform resolution using penalized-likelihood reconstruction in space-variant imaging systems.
    Stayman JW; Fessler JA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Mar; 23(3):269-84. PubMed ID: 15027520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and evaluation of MRI based Bayesian image reconstruction methods for PET.
    Wang CH; Chen JC; Liu RS
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2004 Jun; 28(4):177-84. PubMed ID: 15121207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonparametric regression sinogram smoothing using a roughness-penalized Poisson likelihood objective function.
    La Rivière PJ; Pan X
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Aug; 19(8):773-86. PubMed ID: 11055801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The design and implementation of a motion correction scheme for neurological PET.
    Bloomfield PM; Spinks TJ; Reed J; Schnorr L; Westrip AM; Livieratos L; Fulton R; Jones T
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Apr; 48(8):959-78. PubMed ID: 12741495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image quality assessment of LaBr3-based whole-body 3D PET scanners: a Monte Carlo evaluation.
    Surti S; Karp JS; Muehllehner G
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 49(19):4593-610. PubMed ID: 15552419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental assessment of resolution improvement of a zoom-in PET.
    Qi J; Yang Y; Zhou J; Wu Y; Cherry SR
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):N165-74. PubMed ID: 21828899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of 3-D maximum a posteriori and filtered backprojection algorithms for high-resolution animal imaging with microPET.
    Chatziioannou A; Qi J; Moore A; Annala A; Nguyen K; Leahy R; Cherry SR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 May; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 11021693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.