412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9574102)
1. [Guidelines in surgery: from the viewpoint of the surgical expert].
Carstensen G
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():79-82. PubMed ID: 9574102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The surgeon as expert witness in the quality-malpractice spiral].
Stegers CM
Chirurg; 1999 Dec; 70(12):suppl 338-41. PubMed ID: 10637690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Practice parameters, guidelines, standard].
Ratzel R
Chirurg; 2000 Feb; 71(2):suppl 29-33. PubMed ID: 10734598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Guidelines in surgery: from the viewpoint of the legal process].
Ulsenheimer K
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():74-8. PubMed ID: 9574101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical pathways and guidelines reflected in malpractice judgment].
Ulsenheimer K
Urologe A; 2003 May; 42(5):705-7. PubMed ID: 12858866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Legal malpractice problem of guidelines].
Ulsenheimer K
Versicherungsmedizin; 2001 Jun; 53(2):53-4. PubMed ID: 11411316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Limits of methodological freedom in anesthesia: from the viewpoint of the medical expert].
Dudziak R
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):52-5; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Delegating responsibilities].
Chirurg; 2001 Dec; 72(12):suppl 336-7. PubMed ID: 11824048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Status and function of the anesthesiologic expert witness in the malpractice process].
Ulsenheimer K
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):55-60; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Fault of organisation in hospital and practice].
Wienke A
Laryngorhinootologie; 2006 Aug; 85(8):589-92. PubMed ID: 16625489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Significance of guidelines by specialty societies as clinical pathway in medicine. Malpractice liability of an indication (BGB section 823)].
Wienke A
HNO; 2003 Oct; 51(10):836-88. PubMed ID: 14971426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Legal implications of guidelines].
Dierks C
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2003 Apr; 128(15):815-9. PubMed ID: 12690575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Determining the need for nursing care: specialty experts consulted].
Felzmann R; Wende G
Pflege Z; 2004 Jun; 57(6):419-21. PubMed ID: 15330245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Limits of methodological freedom in anesthesia: from the viewpoint of the legal expert].
Weissauer W
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):48-51; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Ambulatory surgery from the forensic viewpoint].
Ulsenheimer K
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 7959314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Whistle blowing in medicine: between the poles of informing and criminal liability].
Oehler T
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2014 Feb; 139(9):444-7. PubMed ID: 24558000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Regionalization in obstetrics from the forensic viewpoint].
Roemer VM
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7959309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Legal requirements of continuing education and control].
Weissauer W
Chirurg; 1990 Jan; 61(1):suppl 1-3. PubMed ID: 2311448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Expert assessment of rehabilitation for social medicine legal experts--a discussion contribution to quality assurance. From the Quality Management Study Group of the German Society of Social Medicine and Prevention].
Berg A; Hackhausen W; Jochheim KA; Leistner K; Schreiber U
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 1999 May; 38(2):107-26. PubMed ID: 10413803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Medical malpractice from the physician's viewpoint].
Carstensen G
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):570-5. PubMed ID: 8588425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
