These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 957421)

  • 1. The detection and avoidance of false-positive reactions in tests for rubella-specific IgM.
    Pattison JR; Mace JE; Dane DS
    J Med Microbiol; 1976 Aug; 9(3):355-7. PubMed ID: 957421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Rubella virus hemagglutination inhibition IgM antibodies: the method of absorption of IgG by staphylococcal protein A as compared with density gradient ultracentrifugation (author's transl)].
    Roggendorf M; Schneweis KE; Wolff MH
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1976 Aug; 235(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 790852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. False positive IgM-rubella enzyme-linked immunoassay in three first trimester pregnant patients.
    Bellin E; Safyer S; Braslow C
    Pediatr Infect Dis J; 1990 Sep; 9(9):671-2. PubMed ID: 2104524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rubella-specific IgM determination on heat-treated sera.
    Ronalds CJ; Hardiman AE; Grint PC; Kangro HD
    Lancet; 1985 Nov; 2(8463):1071-2. PubMed ID: 2865552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. IgM antibodies in rubella infections: absorption with staphylococcal protein A of sera examined by immunofluorescence and haemagglutination inhibition.
    Jankowski M; Gut W
    Acta Microbiol Pol; 1979; 28(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 94747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Demonstration of IgM rubella antibodies by the combined use of solid phase immunosorbent and hemagglutination inhibition technics].
    Arnold U; Sandow D; Pustowoit B; Hermsdorf S
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1984 Mar; 30(3):148-51. PubMed ID: 6375172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A solid-phase immunosorbent technique for the rapid detection of rubella IgM by haemagglutination inhibition.
    Krech U; Wilhelm JA
    J Gen Virol; 1979 Aug; 44(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 392050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Use of a rapid method for determining primary infection by rubella virus].
    Nates S; Ferreira Centeno A; Márquez A; Zapata M
    Rev Argent Microbiol; 1987; 19(4):153-9. PubMed ID: 2845475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonspecific reactions in the hemagglutination inhibition test for detection of rubella antibodies.
    Budzko DB; Jelinek DF; Wilcke BW
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):818-23. PubMed ID: 7240394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Studies on the management of pregnant women having high hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titer of rubella virus in the first trimester examination of rubella virus antibody in the pregnant women having high HI titer by different methods and prognosis of their infants after birth].
    Hoshiba T; Yabuki Y; Asamoto A; Kimura N; Tanaka J
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1987 Nov; 39(11):1993-9. PubMed ID: 3429981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False positive rubella virus haemagglutination inhibition reactions: occurrence and disclosure.
    Haukenes G; Blom H
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1975; 161(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 167269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Use of staphylococcal protein A for the detection of rubella virus IgM antibodies].
    Crovari P; Gasparini R; Bono A; Lusian F; Tassi GC
    Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1979 Nov; 58(5):371-81. PubMed ID: 553518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Usefulness of determining low-avidity IgG antibodies in the diagnosis of primary rubella infection in pregnant women].
    Lafarga B; Noguera FJ; Pérez MC; Copado R; García A; Soria E
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1998 Nov; 16(9):413-8. PubMed ID: 9887628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rubella IgM antibody determination: comparison of two indirect and two capture commercial enzyme immunoassays.
    Revello MG; Percivalle E; Zavattoni M; Gerna G
    Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):393-401. PubMed ID: 2826972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical rubella after reinfection: false-positive reaction or specific HI antibody?
    Haukenes G; Haram K; Solberg CO
    N Engl J Med; 1973 Aug; 289(8):429. PubMed ID: 4719831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Fractionation of serum by gel filtration: contamination of IgM fractions by non-specific inhibitors of hemagglutination of the rubella virus].
    Merlino C; Angeretti A; Negro Ponzi A
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983; 76(1-6):109-17. PubMed ID: 6679477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Demonstration of Rubella-specific IgG and IgM antibody (sub) classes using the enzyme immunoassay (EIA)].
    Doerr HW; Fleischer G; Wiesmann M
    Immun Infekt; 1984 Feb; 12(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 6398271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acute phase serodiagnosis using Quik-Sep ion exchange chromatography.
    McGraw TP; Dizikes J; Bruckner DA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 Apr; 83(4):488-91. PubMed ID: 3885713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The problem of rubella diagnosis].
    Ehrengut W
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1983; 105(16):1057-61. PubMed ID: 6356717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of methods for detecting specific IgM antibody in infants with congenital rubella.
    Pattison JR; Jackson CM; Hiscock JA; Cradock-Watson JE; Ridehalgh MK
    J Med Microbiol; 1978 Nov; 11(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 364063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.