157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9574727)
1. Comparison of the rapid yeast plus panel with the API20C yeast system for identification of clinically significant isolates of Candida species.
Heelan JS; Sotomayor E; Coon K; D'Arezzo JB
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 May; 36(5):1443-5. PubMed ID: 9574727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative performance of Fungichrom I, Candifast and API 20C Aux systems in the identification of clinically significant yeasts.
Gündeş SG; Gulenc S; Bingol R
J Med Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 50(12):1105-1110. PubMed ID: 11761197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Evaluation of peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization (PNA FISH) method in the identifi cation of Candida species isolated from blood cultures].
Aydemir G; Koç AN; Atalay MA
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2016 Apr; 50(2):293-9. PubMed ID: 27175502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ability of RapID Yeast Plus System to identify 304 clinically significant yeasts within 5 hours.
Kitch TT; Jacobs MR; McGinnis MR; Appelbaum PC
J Clin Microbiol; 1996 May; 34(5):1069-71. PubMed ID: 8727877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of Phoenix™ Yeast ID Panel and API® ID 32C commercial systems for the identification of Candida species isolated from clinical samples].
Gayibova Ü; Dalyan Cılo B; Ağca H; Ener B
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2014 Jul; 48(3):438-48. PubMed ID: 25052110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of methods for yeast identification including CHROMagar Candida, Vitek system YBC and a traditional biochemical method.
Huang LU; Chen CH; Chou CF; Lu JJ; Chi WM; Lee WH
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2001 Oct; 64(10):568-74. PubMed ID: 11791943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Yeast identification in the clinical microbiology laboratory: phenotypical methods.
Freydiere AM; Guinet R; Boiron P
Med Mycol; 2001 Feb; 39(1):9-33. PubMed ID: 11270413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Limitations of the current microbial identification system for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
Kellogg JA; Bankert DA; Chaturvedi V
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 May; 36(5):1197-200. PubMed ID: 9574676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].
Karabıçak N; Uludağ Altun H; Karatuna O; Hazırolan G; Aksu N; Adiloğlu A; Akyar I
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 26167821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card with conventional methods for speciation of Candida.
Sood P; Mishra B; Dogra V; Mandal A
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2000 Apr; 43(2):143-5. PubMed ID: 11217271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of two commercialized systems for the rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
Quindós G; Lipperheide V; Pontón J
Mycoses; 1993; 36(9-10):299-303. PubMed ID: 8015561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Misidentification of clinical yeast isolates by using the updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
Dooley DP; Beckius ML; Jeffrey BS
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Dec; 32(12):2889-92. PubMed ID: 7883873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.
Verweij PE; Breuker IM; Rijs AJ; Meis JF
J Clin Pathol; 1999 Apr; 52(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 10474518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of chromogenic agar, [corrected] VITEK2 YST and VITEK® MS for identification of Candida strains isolated from blood cultures.
Sariguzel FM; Berk E; Koc AN; Sav H; Aydemir G
Infez Med; 2015 Dec; 23(4):318-22. PubMed ID: 26700081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Candida identification: experiences with the Vitek automated system].
Schulz K; Bernhardt H; Schröder G
Mycoses; 1997; 40 Suppl 1():86-90. PubMed ID: 9417520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid identification of Candida dubliniensis with commercial yeast identification systems.
Pincus DH; Coleman DC; Pruitt WR; Padhye AA; Salkin IF; Geimer M; Bassel A; Sullivan DJ; Clarke M; Hearn V
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Nov; 37(11):3533-9. PubMed ID: 10523548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distribution of different yeasts isolates among trauma patients and comparison of accuracy in identification of yeasts by automated method versus conventional methods for better use in low resource countries.
Rajkumari N; Mathur P; Xess I; Misra MC
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2014; 32(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 25297023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
Fenn JP; Segal H; Barland B; Denton D; Whisenant J; Chun H; Christofferson K; Hamilton L; Carroll K
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1184-7. PubMed ID: 8051243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of Vitek 2 for the identification of Candida yeasts].
Ochiuzzi ME; Cataldi S; Guelfand L; Maldonado I; Arechavala A;
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2014; 46(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 25011593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
