221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9575383)
1. Speech sound representation, perception, and plasticity: a neurophysiologic perceptive.
Kraus N; McGee TJ; Koch DB
Audiol Neurootol; 1998; 3(2-3):168-82. PubMed ID: 9575383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech sound perception and learning: biologic bases.
Kraus N; McGee TJ; Koch DB
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1998; 49():7-17. PubMed ID: 10209772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech sound perception, neurophysiology, and plasticity.
Kraus N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1999 Feb; 47(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 10206359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acoustic-phonetic approach toward understanding neural processes and speech perception.
Koch DB; McGee TJ; Bradlow AR; Kraus N
J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Jun; 10(6):304-18. PubMed ID: 10385873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of noise and cue enhancement on neural responses to speech in auditory midbrain, thalamus and cortex.
Cunningham J; Nicol T; King C; Zecker SG; Kraus N
Hear Res; 2002 Jul; 169(1-2):97-111. PubMed ID: 12121743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech training alters consonant and vowel responses in multiple auditory cortex fields.
Engineer CT; Rahebi KC; Buell EP; Fink MK; Kilgard MP
Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():256-64. PubMed ID: 25827927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Knockdown of Dyslexia-Gene Dcdc2 Interferes with Speech Sound Discrimination in Continuous Streams.
Centanni TM; Booker AB; Chen F; Sloan AM; Carraway RS; Rennaker RL; LoTurco JJ; Kilgard MP
J Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 36(17):4895-906. PubMed ID: 27122044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attention fine-tunes auditory-motor processing of speech sounds.
Möttönen R; van de Ven GM; Watkins KE
J Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 34(11):4064-9. PubMed ID: 24623783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The time course of auditory perceptual learning: neurophysiological changes during speech-sound training.
Tremblay K; Kraus N; McGee T
Neuroreport; 1998 Nov; 9(16):3557-60. PubMed ID: 9858359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pairing Speech Sounds With Vagus Nerve Stimulation Drives Stimulus-specific Cortical Plasticity.
Engineer CT; Engineer ND; Riley JR; Seale JD; Kilgard MP
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):637-44. PubMed ID: 25732785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short-term plasticity in the auditory system: differential neural responses to perception and imagery of speech and music.
Meyer M; Elmer S; Baumann S; Jancke L
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):411-31. PubMed ID: 17943016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech sound representation in the brain.
Kraus N; Cheour M
Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(3-4):140-50. PubMed ID: 10859409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neural plasticity following auditory training in children with learning problems.
Hayes EA; Warrier CM; Nicol TG; Zecker SG; Kraus N
Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Apr; 114(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 12686276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Representation of the vocal roughness of aperiodic speech sounds in the auditory cortex.
Yrttiaho S; Alku P; May PJ; Tiitinen H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3177-85. PubMed ID: 19425660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Representation of sound categories in auditory cortical maps.
Guenther FH; Nieto-Castanon A; Ghosh SS; Tourville JA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Feb; 47(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 15072527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cortical Representations of Speech in a Multitalker Auditory Scene.
Puvvada KC; Simon JZ
J Neurosci; 2017 Sep; 37(38):9189-9196. PubMed ID: 28821680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cortical processing of degraded speech sounds: effects of distortion type and continuity.
Miettinen I; Alku P; Yrttiaho S; May PJ; Tiitinen H
Neuroimage; 2012 Apr; 60(2):1036-45. PubMed ID: 22289805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination.
Kraus N; McGee T; Carrell TD; Sharma A
Ear Hear; 1995 Feb; 16(1):19-37. PubMed ID: 7774767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Brain-optimized extraction of complex sound features that drive continuous auditory perception.
Berezutskaya J; Freudenburg ZV; Güçlü U; van Gerven MAJ; Ramsey NF
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Jul; 16(7):e1007992. PubMed ID: 32614826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Responsiveness of the human auditory cortex to degraded speech sounds: reduction of amplitude resolution vs. additive noise.
Miettinen I; Alku P; Salminen N; May PJ; Tiitinen H
Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():298-309. PubMed ID: 20969833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
