145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9575451)
1. A comparative study of routine versus selective fetal anomaly ultrasound scanning.
Long G; Sprigg A
J Med Screen; 1998; 5(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 9575451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic modelling of antenatal screening and ultrasound scanning programmes for identification of fetal abnormalities.
Ritchie K; Bradbury I; Slattery J; Wright D; Iqbal K; Penney G
BJOG; 2005 Jul; 112(7):866-74. PubMed ID: 15957985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Routine obstetric ultrasound services.
Walsh CA; McAuliffe F; Kinsella V; McParland P
Ir Med J; 2013; 106(10):311-3. PubMed ID: 24579412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. First-trimester pregnancy scanning as a screening tool for high-risk and abnormal pregnancies in a district general hospital setting.
Drysdale K; Ridley D; Walker K; Higgins B; Dean T
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Mar; 22(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 12521697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Routine second-trimester ultrasonography in the United States: a cost-benefit analysis.
Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Smulian JC; Beazoglou T; Knuppel RA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Mar; 182(3):655-60. PubMed ID: 10739525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antenatal ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities: a systematic review of studies of cost and cost effectiveness.
Roberts T; Henderson J; Mugford M; Bricker L; Neilson J; Garcia J
BJOG; 2002 Jan; 109(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11843373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Routine radiographer screening for fetal abnormalities by ultrasound in an unselected low risk population.
Shirley IM; Bottomley F; Robinson VP
Br J Radiol; 1992 Jul; 65(775):564-9. PubMed ID: 1515891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost Analysis of Following Up Incomplete Low-Risk Fetal Anatomy Ultrasounds.
O'Brien K; Shainker SA; Modest AM; Spiel MH; Resetkova N; Shah N; Hacker MR
Birth; 2017 Mar; 44(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 27862256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The value of mid-trimester routine ultrasonographic screening in antenatal detection of congenital malformations.
Pitukkijronnakorn S; Chittacharoen A; Jetsawangsri T; Panburana P; Jaovisidha A; Roungsipragarn R; Saropala N; Herabutya Y
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92(6):748-53. PubMed ID: 19530579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound Study: another perspective.
DeVore GR
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):622-6. PubMed ID: 8090403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 13-14-week fetal anatomy scan: a 5-year prospective study.
Ebrashy A; El Kateb A; Momtaz M; El Sheikhah A; Aboulghar MM; Ibrahim M; Saad M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 35(3):292-6. PubMed ID: 20205205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second-trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population.
Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialard F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1379-87. PubMed ID: 16723105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychological outcome in women undergoing termination of pregnancy for ultrasound-detected fetal anomaly in the first and second trimesters: a pilot study.
Davies V; Gledhill J; McFadyen A; Whitlow B; Economides D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 25(4):389-92. PubMed ID: 15791695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Choosing options for ultrasound screening in pregnancy and comparing cost effectiveness: a decision analysis approach.
Roberts T; Mugford M; Piercy J
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Sep; 105(9):960-70. PubMed ID: 9763046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. British National Health Service's and women's costs of antenatal ultrasound screening and follow-up tests.
Henderson J; Bricker L; Roberts T; Mugford M; Garcia J; Neilson J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Aug; 20(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 12153666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Ultrasound screening and diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities between 11-14 gestational weeks].
Markov D; Chernev T; Dimitrova V; Mazneĭkova V; Leroy Y; Jacquemyn Y; Ramaekers P; Van Bulck B; Loquet P
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2004; 43(3):3-10. PubMed ID: 15341249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A proposed protocol for obstetrical ultrasound examination].
Novakov A; Vejnović T; Stojić S; Belopavlović Z
Med Pregl; 1999; 52(9-10):351-6. PubMed ID: 10624383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasound screening for fetal structural abnormalities performed by trained midwives in the second trimester in a low-risk population--an appraisal.
Chen M; Leung TY; Sahota DS; Fung TY; Chan LW; Law LW; Chau MC; Lao TH; Lau TK
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 19412800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Should second trimester ultrasound be routine for all pregnancies?
Makhlouf M; Saade G
Semin Perinatol; 2013 Oct; 37(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 24176154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal karyotyping after 28 weeks of gestation for late ultrasound findings in a low risk population.
Drummond CL; Gomes DM; Senat MV; Audibert F; Dorion A; Ville Y
Prenat Diagn; 2003 Dec; 23(13):1068-72. PubMed ID: 14691994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
