These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9575989)
1. Between a rock and a hard place. The plight of surgeons advocating progress through new technology. Glazier DB; Graham AM Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 9575989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reuse of disposables. Reprocessing issues taking users down 'slippery slope'. OR Manager; 1996 Jun; 12(6):1, 7. PubMed ID: 10157849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy lends itself well to another look at reusable vs. disposable instrument packs. Hickey M; Fields M Hosp Mater Manage; 1996 May; 21(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 10157583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stats. You paid what for those instruments? Mater Manag Health Care; 2000 Dec; 9(12):28. PubMed ID: 11188028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Custom packs and cost realities. Longo F J Healthc Mater Manage; 1987; 5(3):47-9. PubMed ID: 10281410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Endosurgery instruments: reusables vs disposables. Patterson D OR Manager; 1993 Jan; 9(1):1, 6-8. PubMed ID: 10123465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Risky recycling: that "disposable" catheter may have been used before. Hawkins D US News World Rep; 1999 Sep; 127(11):62-4, 66-7. PubMed ID: 10621509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The hidden cost calculator: a new way to look at custom packs. Harmer BA Mater Manag Health Care; 1995 Jul; 4(7):18-9. PubMed ID: 10143817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Usability study of a novel, self-lighted, disposable speculum: military applications. Jones CL; Gruber DD; Warner W; Buller JL Mil Med; 2013 Apr; 178(4):e489-92. PubMed ID: 23707837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Choice to reuse disposables requires factual assessment. Reichert M OR Manager; 1996 Jun; 12(6):8-9. PubMed ID: 10157858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Preliminary survey findings. Reusable vs. disposable laparoscopic instruments. Cahill N Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 May; 78(5):28-9. PubMed ID: 10125975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Standardization of Disposable Instruments in Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: A Case Study in Cost Reduction. Still BR; Christianson LW; Mhlaba JM; O'Malley IP; Song DH; Langerman AJ J Reconstr Microsurg; 2017 Feb; 33(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 27733003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments. DesCĂ´teaux JG; Blackmore K; Parsons L Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Put those nagging sterilization worries to rest, once and for all. McCormack J Mater Manag Health Care; 1995 Sep; 4(9):50, 52. PubMed ID: 10151140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]