306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9576111)
1. Virtual electrode-induced phase singularity: a basic mechanism of defibrillation failure.
Efimov IR; Cheng Y; Van Wagoner DR; Mazgalev T; Tchou PJ
Circ Res; 1998 May; 82(8):918-25. PubMed ID: 9576111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct evidence of the role of virtual electrode-induced phase singularity in success and failure of defibrillation.
Efimov IR; Cheng Y; Yamanouchi Y; Tchou PJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Aug; 11(8):861-8. PubMed ID: 10969748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transmembrane voltage changes produced by real and virtual electrodes during monophasic defibrillation shock delivered by an implantable electrode.
Efimov IR; Cheng YN; Biermann M; Van Wagoner DR; Mazgalev TN; Tchou PJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 8(9):1031-45. PubMed ID: 9300301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Termination of spiral waves with biphasic shocks: role of virtual electrode polarization.
Anderson C; Trayanova N; Skouibine K
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Dec; 11(12):1386-96. PubMed ID: 11196563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual electrode-induced reexcitation: A mechanism of defibrillation.
Cheng Y; Mowrey KA; Van Wagoner DR; Tchou PJ; Efimov IR
Circ Res; 1999 Nov; 85(11):1056-66. PubMed ID: 10571537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Virtual electrode polarization in the far field: implications for external defibrillation.
Efimov IR; Aguel F; Cheng Y; Wollenzier B; Trayanova N
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2000 Sep; 279(3):H1055-70. PubMed ID: 10993768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reversal of repolarization gradient does not reverse the chirality of shock-induced reentry in the rabbit heart.
Cheng Y; Nikolski V; Efimov IR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Sep; 11(9):998-1007. PubMed ID: 11021470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The mechanisms of the vulnerable window: the role of virtual electrodes and shock polarity.
Yamanouchi Y; Cheng Y; Tchou PJ; Efimov IR
Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2001 Jan; 79(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 11201498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tunnel propagation following defibrillation with ICD shocks: hidden postshock activations in the left ventricular wall underlie isoelectric window.
Constantino J; Long Y; Ashihara T; Trayanova NA
Heart Rhythm; 2010 Jul; 7(7):953-61. PubMed ID: 20348028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Epicardial sock mapping following monophasic and biphasic shocks of equal voltage with an endocardial lead system.
Usui M; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Apr; 7(4):322-34. PubMed ID: 8777480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Kinetics of defibrillation shock-induced response: design implications for the optimal defibrillation waveform.
Mowrey KA; Cheng Y; Tchou PJ; Efimov R
Europace; 2002 Jan; 4(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 11846315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in sheep.
Cooper RA; Alferness CA; Smith WM; Ideker RE
Circulation; 1993 May; 87(5):1673-86. PubMed ID: 8491023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phase singularities and termination of spiral wave reentry.
Eason J; Trayanova N
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Jul; 13(7):672-9. PubMed ID: 12139290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanisms of superiority of ascending ramp waveforms: new insights into mechanisms of shock-induced vulnerability and defibrillation.
Qu F; Li L; Nikolski VP; Sharma V; Efimov IR
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2005 Aug; 289(2):H569-77. PubMed ID: 15792989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relation of atrial refractoriness to upper and lower limits of vulnerability for atrial fibrillation/flutter following implantable ventricular defibrillator shocks.
Katz A; Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR; Prystowsky EN
Circulation; 1999 Sep; 100(10):1125-30. PubMed ID: 10477539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preshock phase singularity and the outcome of ventricular defibrillation.
Hayashi H; Lin SF; Chen PS
Heart Rhythm; 2007 Jul; 4(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 17599680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of shock-induced changes in transmembrane potential on reentrant waves and outcome during cardioversion of isolated rabbit hearts.
Evans FG; Ideker RE; Gray RA
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Nov; 13(11):1118-27. PubMed ID: 12475103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Postshock potential gradients and dispersion of repolarization in cells stimulated with monophasic and biphasic waveforms.
Sobie EA; Tung L
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 9(7):743-56. PubMed ID: 9684722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms.
Dixon EG; Tang AS; Wolf PD; Meador JT; Fine MJ; Calfee RV; Ideker RE
Circulation; 1987 Nov; 76(5):1176-84. PubMed ID: 3665001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Epicardial mapping of ventricular defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in dogs.
Zhou X; Daubert JP; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
Circ Res; 1993 Jan; 72(1):145-60. PubMed ID: 8417837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
