These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9577101)

  • 21. The use of the lingual arch in the mixed dentition to resolve incisor crowding.
    Brennan MM; Gianelly AA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 10629524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the fixed appliance.
    Remmer KR; Mamandras AH; Hunter WS; Way DC
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Nov; 88(5):363-72. PubMed ID: 3864370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Changes in mandibular incisor position in Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with premolar extractions.
    Al-Nimri KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Dec; 124(6):708-13. PubMed ID: 14666086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dental changes and space gained as a result of early treatment of pseudo-Class III malocclusion.
    Gu Y; Rabie AB
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Mar; 16(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 11201959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Management of lower incisor crowding in the early mixed dentition.
    Foley TF; Wright GZ; Weinberger SJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 8853819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Expansion of the mandibular arch in children during the mixed dentition period--a clinical study.
    Maki K; Sorada Y; Ansai T; Nishioka T; Braham RL; Konoo T
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 30(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 16937861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The orthodontic treatment of deep bite in adults--a comparison of the straight-wire appliance and the segmented arch technic].
    Weiland F; Bantleon HP; Droschl H
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1992 Jun; 53(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 1634161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample.
    Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):597-609. PubMed ID: 10587592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Post-retention crowding and incisor irregularity: a long-term follow-up evaluation of stability and relapse.
    Kahl-Nieke B; Fischbach H; Schwarze CW
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Aug; 22(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 7577875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of nitanium maxillary expander appliances on dentofacial structures.
    Karaman AI
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):344-54. PubMed ID: 12169035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Crowding and spacing in the dental arches: long-term development in treated and untreated subjects.
    Jonsson T; Magnusson TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):384.e1-384.e7. PubMed ID: 20889033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Predictors of long-term stability of maxillary dental arch dimensions in patients treated with a transpalatal arch followed by fixed appliances.
    Raucci G; Elyasi M; Pachêco-Pereira C; Grassia V; d'Apuzzo F; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():24. PubMed ID: 26215180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cephalometric appraisal of Class II treatment effects after functional and fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Zelderloo A; Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M; Verdonck A; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Jun; 39(3):334-341. PubMed ID: 27742730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Batista KBDSL; Lima T; Palomares N; Carvalho FA; Quintão C; Miguel JAM; Lin YL; Su TL; O'Brien K
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):564. PubMed ID: 29178932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rapid maxillary expansion followed by fixed appliances: a long-term evaluation of changes in arch dimensions.
    McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Herberger TA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):344-53. PubMed ID: 12940553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Functional regulator therapy in treatment of skeletal open-bite.
    Haydar B; Enacar A
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1992 Dec; 34(4):278-87. PubMed ID: 1287155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Space closure and incisor alignment in the mandibular arch following first premolar extraction without appliance therapy.
    Woon KC
    Aust Orthod J; 1989 Oct; 11(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 2639657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Efficacy of orthodontic treatment according to the Peer Assessment Rating index].
    Piskorski D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():335-51. PubMed ID: 15552857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.