440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9577486)
1. Lumbar spine: quantitative and qualitative assessment of positional (upright flexion and extension) MR imaging and myelography.
Wildermuth S; Zanetti M; Duewell S; Schmid MR; Romanowski B; Benini A; Böni T; Hodler J
Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):391-8. PubMed ID: 9577486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography?
Kanno H; Endo T; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Itoi E; Ishii Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E985-92. PubMed ID: 21258271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of lumbar canal stenosis: decubitus imaging methods versus flexion-extension myelography and surface measurements versus the diameter of the dural sac].
Coulier B
JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 10859898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased Facet Fluid Predicts Dynamic Changes in the Dural Sac Size on Axial-Loaded MRI in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.
Kanno H; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Aizawa T; Itoi E
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Apr; 37(4):730-5. PubMed ID: 26564439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Postural changes of the dural sac in the lumbar spines of asymptomatic individuals using positional stand-up magnetic resonance imaging.
Hirasawa Y; Bashir WA; Smith FW; Magnusson ML; Pope MH; Takahashi K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Feb; 32(4):E136-40. PubMed ID: 17304123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positional MR imaging of the lumbar spine: does it demonstrate nerve root compromise not visible at conventional MR imaging?
Weishaupt D; Schmid MR; Zanetti M; Boos N; Romanowski B; Kissling RO; Dvorak J; Hodler J
Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 10751495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Positionally dependent spinal stenosis: correlation of upright flexion-extension myelography and computed tomographic myelography.
Zander DR; Lander PH
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1998 Aug; 49(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 9709684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Positional lumbar imaging using a positional device in a horizontally open-configuration MR unit - initial experience.
Hayashida Y; Hirai T; Hiai Y; Kitajima M; Imuta M; Murakami R; Nakayama Y; Awai K; Yamashita Y; Takahashi T; Hamada K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):525-8. PubMed ID: 17694550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved magnetic resonance myelography of the lumbar spine using image fusion and volumetry.
Eberhardt K; Ganslandt O; Stadlbauer A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 24328762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic changes in the dural sac of patients with lumbar canal stenosis evaluated by multidetector-row computed tomography after myelography.
Kanbara S; Yukawa Y; Ito K; Machino M; Kato F
Eur Spine J; 2014 Jan; 23(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 23817960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR-myelography: a comparison with conventional myelography.
Hergan K; Amann T; Vonbank H; Hefel C
Eur J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 21(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 8777910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of flexion-extension motion of lumbar spine on lumbosacral dural sac. An experimental study.
Dai LY; Xu YK; Zhang WM; Zhou ZH
Chin Med J (Engl); 1991 Jun; 104(6):498-502. PubMed ID: 1874026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of body position and axial load on spinal canal morphology: an MRI study of central spinal stenosis.
Madsen R; Jensen TS; Pope M; Sørensen JS; Bendix T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18165750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic MR in patients affected by neurogenical claudication: technique and results from a single-center experience.
Muto M; Giurazza F; Guarnieri G; Senese R; Schena E; Zeccolini F; Diano A
Neuroradiology; 2016 Aug; 58(8):765-70. PubMed ID: 27209418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in dural sac caliber with standing MRI improve correlation with symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lau YYO; Lee RKL; Griffith JF; Chan CLY; Law SW; Kwok KO
Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2666-2675. PubMed ID: 28702785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Correlation study of spinal canal and dural sac dimensions on MRI with therapy of lumbar disc herniation].
Tang Q; Yuan S; Wang WD; Kong KM; Wang XJ
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2015 Nov; 28(11):994-9. PubMed ID: 26757524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiologic Factors Associated With the Dynamic Change of Dural Sac Diameter in Lumbar Spine: A Kinematic MRI Study.
Takahashi S; Lord EL; Hayashi T; Cohen JR; Lao L; Yao Q; Suzuki A; Nakamura H; Wang JC
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):E827-E832. PubMed ID: 27352368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Axial load-dependent cervical spinal alterations during simulated upright posture: a comparison of healthy controls and patients with cervical degenerative disease.
Kimura S; Hesselink JR; Garfin SR; Kawaji Y; Hasegawa K; Hargens AR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Feb; 2(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 15739524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Normal and degenerative posterior spinal structures: MR imaging.
Grenier N; Kressel HY; Schiebler ML; Grossman RI; Dalinka MK
Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):517-25. PubMed ID: 3659376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The positional magnetic resonance imaging changes in the lumbar spine following insertion of a novel interspinous process distraction device.
Siddiqui M; Nicol M; Karadimas E; Smith F; Wardlaw D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(23):2677-82. PubMed ID: 16319754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
